Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Tariffs will raise $700 billion a year in revenue

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by TheGator, Jul 27, 2025 at 12:59 PM.

  1. 92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    15,343
    14,571
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    See my post above to Az.

    Short term sting.

    The consumer will soon have more disposable income at large due to increases in domestic production--increases in buying power, velocity of money, supply of money, and confidence in the future.

    And your business, like mine, will benefit from that.

    ...or I guess we can continue the Democrat (and est pub) plan--continue spending ourselves into ruin, floating bubble economy with debt spending, continue undermining the value of our dollar, continue shipping our wealth overseas for the luxury of buying cheap Chinese crap...

    ...until the inevitable nuclear crash...

    There's always that option--that same down bound trajectory we've ridden for 25 years now...
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  2. AzCatFan

    AzCatFan GC Hall of Fame

    12,938
    1,237
    1,618
    Apr 9, 2007
    Your thinking like an isolationist. When has that worked in US history? Answer is never. And it won't work this time, and isn't working. The GDP in the US from manufacturing has been shrinking for years, and will likely to continue to shrink. There are several reasons why.

    First is the fact we're a more global economy now than ever before. We may be the biggest consumers, but can a company that manufacturers a good used around the world compete being the lowest price in America due to tariffs, but not the price leader anyplace else in the globe? Economy of scale. Like drone manufacturing, which occurs 90% in China, makes it difficult for a US company to compete. We can tariff the crap out of the Chinese produce until the American manufacturer can compete here on price, but that's still going to hit the consumer's wallet in the US. And the Chinese will still have a significant advantage over parts and, resources, and supply chain because of their global advantage.

    There's also limits to what the US can produce. Do we have the rare elements or the right environment? Take coffee, for example. The only places on US territory that coffee can grow is in Puerto Rico and Hawaii. The climate on the Continental 48 just isn't good for growing coffee. We can't tariff ourselves enough to change our climate fast enough to change this.

    William McKinley thought like you in the 1890s. His tariffs were a major cause of the Panic of 1893. When the Great Depression hit in the 1920's around the globe, our politicians again thought we could take advantage and raised tariffs again. Google October 1929 and see how that one turned out!
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    10,423
    2,379
    3,263
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Even if that's all true, which I don't feel like getting into, it doesn't change the fact that tariffs are ultimately a tax on a consumer. Which is what you questioned.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    18,782
    2,488
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    The funny part of this: the same people that argue "You don't need cheap Chinese goods" will then turn around and try to claim that the people opposing this look down on the people buying those cheap Chinese goods from Walmart, seemingly without any sense of irony.

    Once again, it is an argument arising from resentments, not really facts.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    18,782
    2,488
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Yeah, that isn't how any of this works. If you cut down competition, the disposable income goes down. And producers buy products too, forcing them to have higher costs but allowing them to increase their prices due to lower competition, lowering the purchasing power of end consumers. We don't have tons of idle labor sitting here (in fact, we have spent most of the last decade in a labor shortage).

    Haha, and here is the "cheap Chinese crap" comment right after saying that the liberals look down on the people buying those products from Walmart. Definitely four fingers pointed straight back to you on that accusation.

    Meanwhile, in reality, not your feelings, the stock market has massively increased and individual wealth and real income are way up.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Orange_and_Bluke

    Orange_and_Bluke Premium Member

    11,577
    2,867
    3,288
    Dec 16, 2015
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  7. gator_jo

    gator_jo GC Hall of Fame

    5,094
    512
    303
    Aug 9, 2024
    Winning.


    "Trump gets tariffs; Americans get price hikes"


    Throughout the spring, big retailers and consumer product makers warned that levies on imported goods would squeeze their operations, forcing them to choose between lower earnings and passing on higher costs to customers.

    In the case of Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) and others, it is both of those things.

    On Tuesday, the packaging giant, which makes household basics spanning from Bounty paper towel to Tide detergent, issued a sour outlook for 2025 and sent a message to big retailers like Walmart (NYSE:WMT) that it would have to raise prices on some U.S. goods from next week.


    https://www.investing.com/news/stoc...ets-tariffs-americans-get-price-hikes-4158219
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. AzCatFan

    AzCatFan GC Hall of Fame

    12,938
    1,237
    1,618
    Apr 9, 2007
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. gtr2x

    gtr2x GC Hall of Fame

    17,675
    1,755
    1,593
    Aug 21, 2007
    Rightys supporting tax increases. Bizarre times.
     
  10. GatorWon

    GatorWon GC Hall of Fame

    2,192
    80
    273
    Apr 3, 2007
    Made in America but at Made in China prices.

    When the party of small
    government can reconcile that formula, call me.
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  11. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    To make it at China prices you gotta make it at China wages, so all you have to do is pay workers way less. Problem solved.
     
  12. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    127,072
    165,192
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    And Democrats voted AGAINST:
    • the no tax on tips;
    • no tax on social security;
    • no tax on overtime;
    • and in support of the largest tax increase in US history.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  13. gator_jo

    gator_jo GC Hall of Fame

    5,094
    512
    303
    Aug 9, 2024
    Not really. But whatever it takes to justify throwing an estimated 11.8 million off Medicaid for $4.5 trillion in tax cuts for the rich...

    ... while adding $3.5 trillion to the debt.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2