Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by citygator, Jul 12, 2018.
Talk about about torture and Strzok being a strange one. This hearing is useless since he wont answer anything about the Russia investigation.
He sounds kind of like Keanu Reeves voice but it sounds strange as heck with his facial appearance. If he interviewed me I would have to keep myself from laughing.
Really. Only the Dems?
You take the cake.
It is so clear what this guy thinks of Conservatives, Trump, Trump Supporters, and people not like him.
Y'all love to talk about haters well this elitist A$$ was/is clearly biased and Most of America knows it.
In a Criminal Court all his testimony and investigation would be considered tainted.
As are many on Too Hot
Looks like Page will do a closed door tomorrow.
Lisa Page to privately meet with Congress on Friday and Monday - CNNPolitics
Live is great.
Great as in entertaining. Not great for the country.
Wow I thought too hot had a lot of off topic threads? What is it that everybody here says when a subject is defered? "But your guy".
The full hearing will be on C-SPAN tonight at 8 PM eastern. I've only heard bits and pieces up to this point so I will reserve my comments until I've heard it all.
I'm at home from work sick, so have watched the whole thing (which is sickening).
Both sides should be beyond embarrassed. I'm a little bit of a C-SPAN nerd, so not my first viewing. Feel like I'm watching a battle rap between Tupac and Biggie and not the Congress of the United States. No new facts from either side and a bunch of gentlemen/women with a prescripted address that is grandstanding and does nothing but divide. As for Strzok, weird (but clearly intelligent) dude that obviously didn't belong on these investigations.
Would love to see more focus on the progress / outcome of the investigations.
I'm ecstatic Hillary isn't our President, but would also love to know how Russia influenced that. The latter is more important (in this man's humble opinion) than the fact I got a lesser of two evils in the last election.
Gowdy looks like he is either horribly constipated or counting down the seconds until he gets to move back to South Carolina.
I have had it on on the office. During Watergate, witnesses answered questions and evidence was developed on Congress and this created pressure on witnesses to come forward. The country was better served. I understand the privilege as to ongoing criminal investigations. But, we are an open Democracy.
Its really not worth watching since he wont answer anything meaningful. The guy looks pretty creepy with some of his facial expressions however.
I am disgusted by Republican members of this committee.
I watched one guy, a R ask a long pointed and very accusatory question and then leave before Strzok could begin to answer. Watched a D spend her full 5 minutes telling him that he did no wrong before stopping to ask "isn't that correct Mr. Strzok?" In both cases, the congress person wasn't interested in the answer but just to get their shot in and hope to make nightly news - in my opinion.
And I am disgusted with your discust.
And the Dems are even worse. Oh yeah, there your gang.
This guy is an all out liar.
Do you remember Mark Furman and The OJ Trial?
Not even close to this and all his testimony and I believe evidence was discredited.
The grandstanding on both sides and the failure to ask questions is really pathetic. Strzok is a very talented guy, but his texts are a disgrace. Mueller was absolutely right to kick this guy off the investigation. The intel agents on this board can tell you how he compromised himself as a counterintelligence agent. The fact that he spoke his opinions is reflective of poor judgment. It is great to have opinions, but keep them to yourself when you are involved in a criminal investigation of political figures. He has his First Amendment rights. But, he would be destroyed on cross examination in any meaningful questioning in front of a jury
You typed the words right out of my mouth.
This is embarrassing all the way around.
Both parties should be ashamed of themselves, my god.
I enjoyed his rehearsed indignation with Gowdy, just like Hillary's in her Benghazi hearing ("What difference, at this point, does it make?!!!!!").
1- Do you all really think that in 2016 this was the "first" time Russia tried to interfere and cause division in a US Presidential election?
2- Do you all recall how Obama literally laughed at Romney when Mitt responded that Russia was our primary enemy, yet not Obamaites and MSM nitwits claim Russia is so very evil and Trump should not meet w/ Putin? They mocked Romney. So what happened, did Putin go from Teddy Bear to Ted Bear Bundy.
3- If you were running Russia would it not best serve your interest to try to cause discord by pushing for the underdog in an election, as opposed to the favorite? The closer any election turns out typically the more discord there is after the election is over, in any country.
4- If Peter Pecker Strozckx (Boinker of Lovely Lisa Page) reached the level of Deputy Director of Counter Intelligence, don't you think his use of a government device for texting such info w/ his Boink Buddy put him in a potentially precarious security position?
5- Why do all these people have to testify under oath when HRC got to do so in private, un-recorded, not under oath, and with free gummy bears and her favorite Scotch to sip on?
When I first turned it on and saw him, I wondered what Jimmy Kimmel was doing at a House committee hearing. But at least he had shaved for it.