Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

So many judges, so many losses - Another Two for Tuesday

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by G8trGr8t, Feb 25, 2025.

  1. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    36,018
    12,642
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    1. judges are liberal and therefore not qualified..damn near every single one of em..liberal law schools..
    2. judges cannot determine what laws mean
    3. doesn't matter what they say

    did I get the order right or are you supposed to mix it up when you repeat the talking points?

    like all 66 judges who ruled against the false claims of corruption in the 2020 election..all corrupt, every single one of em. 0 - 66..smdh @ people that still believe anything he says
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2025 at 5:38 PM
    • Winner Winner x 2
  2. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    126,149
    164,814
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    Looks like the SCOTUS reversed this one, even if it is temporary it shows the SCOTUS's thoughts on the issue.
     
  3. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    36,018
    12,642
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Donald Trump Suffers Double Legal Blow In Hours

    President Donald Trump suffered two legal setbacks on Tuesday when one federal judge in Rhode Island halted some of his cuts at federal agencies, and another in Manhattan blocked him from canceling unspent aid intended to help schools move on from COVID.

    U.S. District Judge John McConnell, Jr. in Rhode Island said Trump can't unilaterally end the funding and programs for the Institute of Museum and Library Services, the Minority Business Development Agency, and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.
     
  4. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    36,018
    12,642
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    judge rules that the admin lied about why prisoner had to be transferred. what happens when you lie to the court?

    'Wow!’ Expert stunned as judge exposes Trump admin's bid to skirt detainee's rights - Raw Story

    The case in question concerns Badar Khan Suri, an Indian-born researcher at Georgetown University who was working legally in the United States before being arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in March and transported from Virginia to a facility in Texas ahead of a planned deportation — a move that some obvservers decried as a "government abduction."

    On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Patricia Giles of Virginia tore into this move in a blistering opinion, writing that the transportation to Texas, which the administration had claimed was about bed space, was a blatant attempt to prevent Suri from exercising his legal rights.

    "Drawing all inferences in favor of Petitioner, the Court infers that Petitioner's transfer to Texas was not about bedspace," wrote Giles. "The second issue — Petitioner's NTA — also suggests that Respondents' design was to forum shop and spirit Petitioner away from this District before his counsel could file a petition."
    .......................................
    "WOW. Judge Giles concludes that ICE’s decision to transfer Badar Khan Suri out of Virginia to Texas was intended 'to make it difficult for Petitioner's counsel to file the [habeas] petition and to transfer him to the Government's chosen forum,'" he wrote. "Judge Giles says that ICE’s claim that it sent Mr. Khan Suri to Texas because there wasn’t enough bed space in Virginia is not believable. [She] emphasizes that ICE issued a Notice to Appear listing an address as a Texas detention center BEFORE he even got to the field office!"