Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

No 'authority to compel speech': Appeals court rules officials cannot force students to use 'preferr

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by flgator2, Nov 8, 2025.

  1. flgator2

    flgator2 GC Hall of Fame

    8,365
    945
    2,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    Gainesville
    No 'authority to compel speech': Appeals court rules officials cannot force students to use 'preferred pronouns' * WorldNetDaily * by Jaryn Crouson, Daily Caller News Foundation

    Defending Education (DE) filed the suit against Olentangy Local School District (OLSD) in 2023, arguing the district's anti-harassment policy that requires students to use the "preferred pronouns" of others violates students' First Amendment rights by "compelling students to affirm beliefs about sex and gender that are contrary to their own deeply held beliefs." Although a lower court attempted to shoot down the challenge, the appeals court ruled in a 10-7 decision that the school cannot "wield their authority to compel speech or demand silence from citizens who disagree with the regulators' politically controversial preferred new form of grammar."

    Because the school considers transgender students to be a protected class, students who violated the anti-harassment policy by referring to such students by their biological sex risked punishments such as suspension and expulsion, according to DE.

    "American history and tradition uphold the majority's decision to strike down the school's pronoun policy," the court wrote in its opinion. "Over hundreds of years, grammar has developed in America without governmental interference. Consistent with our historical tradition and our cherished First Amendment, the pronoun debate must be won through individual persuasion, not government coercion. Our system forbids public schools from becoming 'enclaves of totalitarianism.'"

    "Despite its ham-fisted attempt to moot the case, Olentangy School District was sternly reminded by the 6th circuit en banc court that it cannot force students to express a viewpoint on gender identity with which they disagree, nor extend its reach beyond the schoolhouse threshold into matters better suited to an exercise of parental authority," Sarah Parshall Perry, vice president and legal fellow at DE, said in a statement. "A resounding victory for student speech and parental rights was long overdue for families in the school district and we are thrilled the court's ruling will benefit others seeking to vindicate their rights in the classroom and beyond."

    It's pathetic that this liberal bullshit their trying to force on others even had to go to court, Liberalism equals mental illness
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    93,646
    28,031
    14,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    In other words... I do NOT have to play your psychotic name games anymore.

    The common sense in that ruling is overwhelming me with happiness.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    11,301
    2,652
    1,733
    May 31, 2007
    Land o' Lakes, FL
    This is the only right answer. Ask people to play along, no problem. Advise people it’s polite to just play along, no problem. Tell people they have to play along or else, and people will go out of their way to prove they don’t have to.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Funny Funny x 1
  4. gator_fever

    gator_fever GC Hall of Fame

    1,992
    235
    2,068
    Nov 3, 2013
    Yep the crooked leftist Judges tried to say they could to maintain order at the schools basically. It's crazy the spin they do when trying to legislate from the bench basically.
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2025
  5. WC53

    WC53 GC Hall of Fame

    6,259
    1,198
    2,088
    Oct 17, 2015
    Old City
    No more build a bear