Every word of this. We have a 27 year old allegation with flimsy evidence, and a 30+ year old allegation with (IMO) even flimsier evidence. Neither are disqualifying- not even close. (Both because of the age and the lack of evidence.) This should be apparent to anyone who is fair-minded, but because of partisanship, one or both is used as a hammer on those we don't like. I guess I have a unique perspective because I thought the Kavanaugh thing was a witch-hunt, but I will be so so so glad to be rid of DJT. I wish we had a few more on this board who could see that.