Discussion in 'GatorNana's Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by Gator515151, Apr 2, 2020.
Maynard called and said a 7empist must be just like this.
You’re not following me. She’s proven that she’s not interested in waste fraud etc. she’s going after trump. PS. when have the dems or the repubs EVER tried to get waste/fraud under control.? ANSWER: NEVER.
Different political times my friend. After WWII the entire country was on board with the government and Truman. Today, not so much.
He follows you. We all do. We just think you’re being irrational.
Irrational? To think we’re hyper politicized? Really?
Glad you can speak for everyone else.
Yes. It’s a bipartisan check based on a WWII model on two trillion dollars by Congress of a President who fired the IG that was tasked with oversight of it this morning and you’re acting like it is the Starr Chamber.
So yes. You’re being irrational.
Definitely different political times. During the Great Depression and World War II we had a president who considered himself the president of all the people, not just the 40% or so that represent his hardcore supporters.
I’m not supporting nor not supporting trump. All I’m saying is the house committee will be biased. Like everything political. How is that being irrational ?
Nancy P is the one who needs oversight.
This... and needs to be investigated. How did she and her husband make so many millions of dollars while she was in office? Her family needs to be audited.
This committee should be set up after we're out of this mess, hopefully in a few months.
There are millions of people now without income, that would prefer to have help before a few more months go by.
Geez. The money is going out to people now. The witch-hunt will happen later. Two different things
how long you think it's going to take to issue supoenas, get testimony, meet, and get to whatever they are trying to do. This should not be for real-time micro-managing
There is a difference between monitoring and investigating. We need near real time monitoring as it is a whopping sum of money. If monitoring identifies some red flags then investigations can be launched after the fact. Given Trump's long history of ignoring the law, crony government, political acts done as favors to supporters, and rampant nepotism the need for oversight is obvious.
Do you think there should be any oversight into the millions going out?