Discussion in 'GatorNana's Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by Gator515151, Apr 2, 2020.
Getting a time out(ban) from the mods a few times tampers the urge....sometimes
no self respecting Texan would ever apologize to Oklahoma #hook’em.
If Boehner or Ryan had done to this to Obama and TARP you'd be screaming "the constitution works".
What's your problem with it if its bipartisan?
My go to is usually animal pictures. They don’t improve the dialogue, but they add a little brevity and make me laugh instead of head butting my keyboard until something breaks.
Also, enjoying your well thought out posts here.
Once you get a couple of mandatory vacations and warnings, you find creative, effective ways to get your point across without cussing
Congressional oversight of the Executive is written into the Constitution. When we're talking about trillions of dollars, there needs to be oversight. Hopefully, the committee won't have to be too busy because the money in the bill is spent as intended, and there are few, if any issues with the disbursement of monies. But if there is any "funny" business, which often happens when we're talking about sums of money this large and bureaucrats, it's best to have oversight.
You learn after a while, you may see Trump referred to as the Liar in Chief a dozen times but as soon as you refer to Nancy as the Liar of the House you are getting deleted.
In my experience on the insider boards, I’ve never had a mod delete something that I didn’t know was outside the rules. I’m occasionally a pain in the butt and accept when the mods point it out.
I hear tiny violins.
That is totally erroneous.
If you could provide a link to an article like this concerning Nancy Pelosi's veracity or lack thereof, the mods should apologize to you.
President Trump made 16,241 false or misleading claims in his first three years
Speaking only for myself I have never referred to Trump as the Liar in Chief although I have referred to him as the Insult Comedian in Chief in several posts and he continues to validate that description.
For the last two months Nancy has been mostly out of site and out of mind. EXACTLY where she should be!!
Might possibly be ever so slightly exaggerated Hall, but totally erroneous? No way!
Then you must be seeing the Mod Enclave because that would be the only way you could make a judgment such as that. Of course, the problem with that scenario is you would then see it is erroneous just as I said.
What, are gonna do all their oversight from home?
Watch where $2T goes and tell the people who gave it, outrageous!!
You make this claim periodically and each time I do a search. The most common use of 'liar in chief' on this board is you complaining about other people supposedly using the term.
Odd. A poorly thought out new topic didn’t go as anticipated by this OP.
Follow the Mark Twain approach: “Substitute 'damn' every time you're inclined to write 'very. Your editor will delete it and the writing will be just as it should be.”
Just replace all the expletives with names of politicians you don't like and the mods will decide whether or not it's appropriate. Anyone who disagrees can go Spiro Agnew right up the old Andrew Jackson.
I could save them a crap load of time and hot air, just use the same list of who got bailed out last time...oversight.