Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Lots of winning

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by Tjgators, Jun 29, 2025.

  1. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,950
    1,886
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    The only way to win is to support the second most expensive form of energy (behind nuclear) that also happens to be the deadliest form of energy. Cheap and safe is woke!
     
  2. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    18,812
    2,500
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    The problem is the dual mandate. The latest inflation numbers ticked up. Basically, this is now an empirical question of how the deadweight loss of the tariffs will manifest:

    1. A more traditional recessionary scenario, where people stop buying things due to tariffs and prices don't increase because of it, allowing the Fed to cut rates.

    2. A more inflation-oriented reaction, in which the Fed needs to increase rates to hold down inflation but consumers and businesses keep buying at high rates.

    3. A combination of the two, essentially a stagflationary impact. That leaves the Fed with very few options to pursue both mandates and likely leads to substantial instability in the Fed as they fight about which mandate to prioritize (which Trump will use to try to consolidate power).

    The first data looked like number 1 (e.g., drops in consumer spending but limited changes to inflation), but I think you are seeing signs of number 3 popping up.