I didn't say him being a belligerent drunk proved anything. I did say that with other evidence it could be a piece of the puzzle that would be considered in a case - especially a civil suit looking at preponderance of the evidence. And it is definitely more relevant than somebody saying some stupid expletive phrase. If the accused is cited as being drunk at the time of the alleged attack, just the impact of drinking makes sexual assault an increased likelihood. If the accused is also cited by multiple other parties as being a frequent belligerent drunk, it is a relevant piece of the puzzle, and a jury would consider it, along with everything else brought to them.