Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

I've been wondering what liberals think about Rachel Maddow moderating the debates?

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by Gator515151, Jun 12, 2019.

  1. Spurffelbow833

    Spurffelbow833 GC Hall of Fame

    8,398
    404
    623
    Jan 9, 2009
    Rachel Maddow can't moderate, but she can liberate.
     
    • Wish I would have said that Wish I would have said that x 1
  2. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    3,552
    332
    423
    Apr 16, 2007
    Wouldn't be a good choice for a Presidential debate due to being overly partisan, but for a primary I don't see the issue. She seems fairly sharp as an interviewer, and while on a partisan mission, seems to generally stick to digging up actual facts - unlike the shouting matches/faux outrage trolling that Fox's partisan hosts tend to resort to these days.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  3. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    7,589
    226
    333
    Apr 8, 2007
    "So in 1987 so and so got a letter in the mail" and 20 minutes later she still hasn't gotten to any kind of salient point.....
     
  4. RealGatorFan

    RealGatorFan Premium Member

    12,446
    210
    633
    Apr 3, 2007
    Yep and before we bash Trump, there was an article put out by MSN or CNN earlier this week that offers a glimpse of the massive debt expansion the democratic candidates are campaigning on. $40T anyone? The thing is and this is why I have issues with democrats is they spend their careers in the stall and they have no clue who fills the paper towels. Rarely any of them own businesses or have worked for a living. And yet they want this massive debt expansion. But who is going to give us the cash? The world doesn't have that cash to offer. We can't just print it either. We are getting our deficits paid by the weekly sale of treasury bills, but what happens if we need $5T and the world says "No Thanks."?
     
  5. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    8,024
    690
    533
    Apr 8, 2007
    Maybe the same question should have been asked prior to enactment of the deficit-exploding tax cut?
     
  6. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    70,399
    35,269
    2,858
    Apr 3, 2007
    Miami, OK
    She will be fine for the D debates.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. OaktownGator

    OaktownGator Guardian of the GC Galaxy Moderator VIP Member

    24,456
    1,558
    2,023
    Apr 3, 2007
    For the win!
     
  8. OaktownGator

    OaktownGator Guardian of the GC Galaxy Moderator VIP Member

    24,456
    1,558
    2,023
    Apr 3, 2007
    On topic, my brother watches Maddow and I find her insufferable. Takes forever "educating" her audience on background stuff (with her slant of course) and never gets to the freaking point.

    But that shouldn't be an issue as a debate moderator.

    Whether she will do a good job as a moderator I have no idea, but she won't have the platform to do her normal schtick, so I think it's possible. She does seem pretty intelligent and well informed.
     
  9. altalias

    altalias GC Legend

    770
    37
    303
    Aug 13, 2008
    Since the process of electing a president has devolved into a circus it is entirely expected that they would include clowns in the show.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  10. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    7,589
    226
    333
    Apr 8, 2007
    We have reached the point where the debates should be hosted on the Jerry Springer show....
     
  11. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    8,024
    690
    533
    Apr 8, 2007
    The process devolved into a clown shown during the 2016 Republican primary campaign when one of the candidates began performing like a standup comedian and started ridiculing his opponents with juvenile nicknames rather addressing the issues.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. citygator

    citygator Premium Member

    3,011
    808
    618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Link? :)
     
  13. carpeveritas

    carpeveritas GC Legend

    732
    231
    273
    Dec 31, 2016
    The music stops and the bread lines form. I think we have enough historical and present data to bear that out.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. carpeveritas

    carpeveritas GC Legend

    732
    231
    273
    Dec 31, 2016
    Scroll down the page and you will see tax revenues from 1960 up through the projected revenue for 2020. In 1990 we eclipsed the $1 Trillion dollar mark and that was with the broken promise of no more taxes by President George H.W. Bush. President Bush raised taxes and lost his re-election bid. With the exception of years 2001-2004 the coffers have never taken a downfall. During President George W. Bushes tenure revenues dropped. Keep in mind President Bush was still in office in 2005 when tax revenues began to climb again past the $2T mark. From there on in the revenues have since eclipsed the $3T mark.

    US Tax Revenue by Year
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    3,552
    332
    423
    Apr 16, 2007
    When's the last time our population declined? Even the great recession only slightly and temporarily reduced overall tax receipts. Unless we see a population decline, it would be a sign if tremendous economic weakness to see a decline in revenues or in govt spending in absolute terms.

    Govt revenues should essentially track with inflation, if anything they might not be keeping up because wages have been stagnant. All the masses of middle class folks haven't seen a pay increase to keep up with inflation in forever, thus are not paying as much in taxes as they would if wages had not stagnated. Nice that we gave the billionare class a break though. That's sure to fix the problem.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. tarponbro

    tarponbro GC Legend

    567
    107
    253
    Feb 10, 2016
    Bernie Sanders has already said how he'll fund Medicare for all. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe he said it will be through taxes. What taxes and how much is the big question.
     
  17. carpeveritas

    carpeveritas GC Legend

    732
    231
    273
    Dec 31, 2016
    It's still a simple issue of spending more than we take in regardless of population growth and inflation adjustments. I'll concede the population has grown year after year from 1960 to present and yet this population growth does not satisfy the insatiable appetite of our Federal Government period.

    As for the billionaire class and a break no matter how you slice it the billionaire class will never satisfy the insatiable appetite of our Federal Government either. Your grasping at straws if you believe the wealthy will carry the weight. It is mathematically impossible for them to do so given the way we manage our finances.
     
  18. carpeveritas

    carpeveritas GC Legend

    732
    231
    273
    Dec 31, 2016
    True, Bernie finally fessed up and said it will be paid for through taxes. In reality that's the only way the federal government can pay for anything. Where he intends to get the taxes from remains to be seen and as we all know the wealthy cannot pay for it all. I also doubt Bernie is willing to give up his millionaire status for Medicare.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  19. tarponbro

    tarponbro GC Legend

    567
    107
    253
    Feb 10, 2016
    Finally, an honest politician!!! Just kidding, y'all...
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  20. hoyt233

    hoyt233 GC Hall of Fame

    1,579
    559
    458
    Aug 31, 2009
    Prattvile, AL-Go Lions!
    How about "The Biggest Loser".
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Wish I would have said that Wish I would have said that x 1