Gay couple charged with molesting their sons and pimping them out to pedophile ring

Uhhh other than sharing something terrible why was this posted?

 

ok, so we have established that not just heterosexual couples can be disgusting perverts, but homosexual couples as well. Thanks for posting, I was really worried that only heteros were disgusting sickos.

 

Disgusting , those sickos need to be locked up for life. Those poor boys scarred for life

 

Hell is not hot enough for these two.

 

This is just ignorant, thanks for showing genuine concern for these young boys.

 

Did you care about these children? I searched for old threads and did not find your posts of outrage over these. Now THAT is IGNORANT.

https://www.newsobserver.com/news/state/north-carolina/article265904261.html

Woman gets prison for helping her husband rape kids

https://www.wspa.com/news/nc-husband-wife-charged-after-3-kids-sexually-assaulted-deputies-say/

 

Monk, maybe you can explain why you posted this.
Thanks

 

I care for any child that goes through this and all of these stories are horrific, and those sickos need to be locked up for life. There's nothing ignorant about what I posted or my responses, however you can't say the same that's why you're getting so upset.

 

To show that gay people are "groomers," of course. The sexual preference of these two is just to sensationalize the story for you know who. Anyone who does this to children deserves the absolute harshest punishment the law allows.

 

What's with you lately? What's there to explain, two sickos did horrific things to these young boys. It would doesn't matter that they're gay, lesbians, black, white, identify as a cat or suffering from the false covid jabs what was done was sick. Is it really that hard for you to understand this, if so you should seek some help

 

Sure its a terrible crime but what is the debate? OP offered no commentary.

I remember the days when Too Hot was peppered with daily "black crimes" straight from the Drudge report section in an attempt to dehumanize a marginalized group of Americans.

Clearly "gay crimes" is the next iteration.

 

Maybe his point is that evil knows no boundaries.

 

85% of juvenile victims are female, and men make up 99% of sexual predators... should we start a post about every heterosexual sex crime?

 

Good to know that we shouldn't post something if the perpetrators of heinous crimes happen to be minorities.

God forbid a disturbing factual story is posted if the bad guy happens to be a minority.

 

Really??? You’ve got to be shitting me. Monk doesn’t owe anyone an explanation. If stories like this from the lefties were eliminated there would only be 3-4 posts per day on TH. (And I’m exaggerating that for you with your panties in a wad. You don’t have to go through old threads to give us an exact count. But for the few of you who will anyway; have fun.)

 

Was there a thread about them to comment in? He wasnt suggesting you craw the web for them.

 

I remember when we had members of our local leftist try to assinuate people are homophobic, Racist, anti-vaccine oh wait a minute our locals haven't stopped And some even get desperate when they can't respond and attack the source

 

The question was asked by River - and others - why the OP started the thread with no comment. He is in the habit of doing this on Too Hot and other forums. Some people find it annoying and it can leave a thread to stray rudderless and into speculative territory accompanied by the insults and innuendoes commonplace on Too Hot threads.

In the last 2 days @gatormonk has started 5 threads with a linked headline with no added comment on Too Hot and other forums. Two of them were on sexual offenses. It is annoying and River's question of Monk - also voiced by others - is a fair question. Why did Monk start the thread and what is his opinion of what happened.

There is nothing "ignorant" about asking a question. Asking questions and receiving answers dispels ignorance.

Yes, There are times it is necessary to count.

 

You just don't get it. The insertion of the descriptor "gay" in the title of this thread has nothing to do with the horrendous nature of the couple's conduct unless you are trying to flame certain prejudices. That is not unlike how some used to post threads here when a black person was accused of some horrific crime and always included "black" in the title even though race had nothing to do with the crime.

For example, "Black man rapes white woman." Please tell me what that title is attempting to do?