Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

FBI Executed a Warrant at Mar a Lago; the Investigation Continues

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by duchen, Aug 8, 2022.

  1. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    12,662
    4,858
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    The Patel news is indicative of the investigation coming to an end. And there is no colorable claim of executive privilege for statements made after Trump left office. The FBI likely already knows from documents and other evidence the information Patel has, but wants his testimony for the grand jury. With Jordan’s letter that the new House is going to demand all of the DOJ information surrounding the warrant, the pressure is there to make the charging decision before January. It is evident that the GOP controlled House Intel committee will obtain DOJ materials to feed to Trumps real like it did in the Russia investigation. Once an indictment issued, the court has greater control over evidence in an open case. If there is one.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  2. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    13,566
    12,898
    1,653
    Apr 8, 2007
    So in effect, his defense team will include the US House of Representatives. Just the way the founders intended. :rolleyes:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    16,722
    2,581
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    So the emails released yesterday have some new revelations, none of which should be found surprising. Many people are focusing on the fact that he spending crew accurately saw Justice Thomas as the most unprincipled hack on the court. I say that because they were saying they thought he was their best shot at the same time they were a acknowledging they had no valid legal case.

    Thomas is certainly a hack, but they are stiff competition on this court as to who is the most unprincipled purely political actor in a robe.

    In an email from Chesebro to Eastman and several others sent on Dec. 31, 2020, Chesebro argued that Thomas would “end up being key” to asking the high court to overturn then-President-elect Joe Biden’s win in contested states, and that they should “frame things so that Thomas could be the one to issue some sort of stay or other circuit justice opinion saying Georgia is in legitimate doubt.”

    Realistically, our only chance to get a favorable judicial opinion by Jan. 6, which might hold up the Georgia count in Congress, is from Thomas — do you agree, Prof. Eastman?”



    But what I also found interesting is the profound sense of victimization which infects the modern right wing, the perception that any ordinary consequences to egregious actions is somehow unfair to them, as evidenced by Eastman here talking about the fact that it would require some aggressive DA to prosecute Trump for very knowingly lying under oath to try to subvert democracy and overturn election. Such unfairness.

    In another Dec. 31, 2020, email, Eastman expresses concerns about legal issues Trump might face in signing a new verification for a lawsuit that had already been filed regarding voter fraud, given that he has “since been made aware that some of the allegations (and evidence proffered by the experts) has been inaccurate.

    “And I have no doubt that an aggressive DA or US (Attorney) someplace will go after both the President and his lawyers once all the dust settles on this,” Eastman wrote to Alex Kaufman and Kurt Hilbert, two Georgia-based lawyers who were working on Trump’s legal challenges to the election.



    By the way, Trump did sign under oath a verification of facts he knew were false.



    Emails: Trump lawyers saw Thomas as key to halt electoral count
    Emails: Trump lawyers saw Thomas as key to halt electoral count - Tampa Bay Times

    For more great content like this subscribe to the Tampa Bay Times app here:
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2022
    • Informative Informative x 3
  4. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    28,543
    11,252
    3,443
    Aug 26, 2008
    Do you think that maybe Patel was the inside source all along?
     
  5. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    12,662
    4,858
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  6. rtgator

    rtgator Premium Member

    6,462
    666
    458
    Apr 3, 2007
    Trump Mar-a-Lago special master review overturned, appeals court rules

    Appeals court overturns special master review of records found at Trump's Mar-a-Lago

    The ruling clears the way for federal investigators to use the records in its investigation of Trump's unauthorized transfer of classified documents to his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida.
     
  7. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    13,566
    12,898
    1,653
    Apr 8, 2007
    So the special master circus bought him a couple of months, and now back to your regular criminal investigation.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  8. rtgator

    rtgator Premium Member

    6,462
    666
    458
    Apr 3, 2007
    FB_IMG_1663355491390.jpg
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
  9. obgator

    obgator GC Hall of Fame

    1,043
    992
    2,003
    Apr 3, 2007
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 5
  10. rtgator

    rtgator Premium Member

    6,462
    666
    458
    Apr 3, 2007
    FB_IMG_1663897712236.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

    • Funny Funny x 1
  11. Norcaligator

    Norcaligator GC Hall of Fame

    1,099
    140
    288
    Sep 21, 2007
    Great opening:
    “This appeal requires us to consider whether the district court had jurisdiction to block the United States from using lawfully seized records in a criminal investigation. The answer is no.”
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  12. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    12,662
    4,858
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    The better line is where they indicates that they are not creating a special rule for a former president. That just slams the trial court. In legal parlance, this opinion basically says that the District Court ignored the law. Remember when the master asked for briefing on this, the District Court overruled the master. And then they go into the long standing rule that tue trial judge cited and ignored. This was easy. I said day 1 that there was no jurisdiction for the district court’s order and that the remedy was a Rule 41 motion for return of property. And, Trump could have secured a special master with proper arguments to the court that issued the warrant— just like in the Michael Cohen case. So i throw this out— the District Court cited and refuse to apply the long-standing binding precedent. Why? What do you think the motivation was? Meanwhile, Trump did get what he wanted. Delay until the House goes GOP so that the new GOP controlled judiciary committee can subpoena every record from DOJ concerning this investigation and then show what they get to Trump’s team.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  13. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    5,140
    2,150
    2,798
    Jan 15, 2008
    You know the answers to each of your questions. The hand-picked judge was repaying a debt to the guy who gave her the job. Period. There will be no repercussions, her cronyism will be forgotten in a few years, except that she will forever be a hero to the MAGA cult.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
  14. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    12,662
    4,858
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    And maybe move up the federal judicial ladder
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. jeffbrig

    jeffbrig GC Hall of Fame

    1,288
    431
    1,948
    Aug 7, 2007
    Blistering...

     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  16. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    33,613
    1,390
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    • Informative Informative x 3
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  17. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    13,841
    1,012
    2,038
    Jan 5, 2022
    Just checking in. This fell apart weeks ago, right ?
     
  18. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    13,874
    1,601
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Nope. Sorry.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  19. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    16,951
    1,560
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    No, but several far-right outlets did publish stories with headlines that made it sound like it all fell apart. Those who looked past the headline would find that what fell apart was the speculation that Trump was trying to sell nuclear secrets. There was no evidence found that he was trying to sell nuclear secrets. But the headlines were written to mislead those who didn't want to know the truth.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  20. Gator515151

    Gator515151 GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 4, 2007
    Sounds more to me like he may have hired a team of lawyers to look over documents that somebody else could claim are classified. If he knew he had classified information he wouldn't have to search for it. Think of it as sort of a hunt before the witch hunt.