Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Example Behavior of Intolerant Liberals

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by ETGator1, May 9, 2025 at 11:02 AM.

Page 2 of 2
  1. May 9, 2025 at 3:59 PM #21
    gatordavisl

    gatordavisl GC Hall of Fame

    33,498
    55,380
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    Word is that there was a second spitter hiding behind a wall on a nearby grassy knoll.
     
    • Funny Funny x 6
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  2. May 9, 2025 at 4:01 PM #22
    ETGator1

    ETGator1 GC Hall of Fame

    16,439
    2,097
    808
    Apr 3, 2007
    I feel sorry for the dog. It can't be having much of a life living with such a deranged woke individual.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2025 at 6:18 AM
    • Like Like x 1
  3. May 9, 2025 at 4:31 PM #23
    NavyGator93

    NavyGator93 GC Hall of Fame

    2,062
    782
    2,663
    Dec 4, 2015
    Georgia
    • Like Like x 1
  4. May 9, 2025 at 5:25 PM #24
    gatordavisl

    gatordavisl GC Hall of Fame

    33,498
    55,380
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    You start a thread about a spitting incident, generalize the behavior to libs, then lament another being not having much of a life . . . . :emoji_thinking:
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  5. May 9, 2025 at 5:55 PM #25
    coleg

    coleg GC Hall of Fame

    2,314
    840
    1,903
    Sep 5, 2011
    Poster reminds me of Tina Turner....... "trollin, trollin, trolin down the river". Seems to take a crap source clickbait one-off incident to put the broad brush to work. Very low-level contribution.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  6. May 9, 2025 at 6:02 PM #26
    dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    11,994
    810
    1,708
    Apr 26, 2007
    He's just really really mad at liberals.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2025 at 6:19 AM
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  7. May 9, 2025 at 7:05 PM #27
    slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    4,130
    873
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    Example of why Rule #20 does not change the tone of THfSG. Anyone can pay to get a blue check on X.
     
  8. May 9, 2025 at 7:41 PM #28
    l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,581
    1,819
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    You spoke of your goal to tone down the tenor of the forum (in so many words). How do you think this thread fits in with that?
     
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  9. May 9, 2025 at 10:44 PM #29
    citygator

    citygator GC Hall of Fame

    14,060
    2,898
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Breaking his own recently made up rule about insulting groups. "intolerant Liberals".
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  10. May 9, 2025 at 10:56 PM #30
    l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,581
    1,819
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  11. May 9, 2025 at 10:59 PM #31
    l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,581
    1,819
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  12. May 10, 2025 at 3:51 AM #32
    flgator2

    flgator2 GC Hall of Fame

    7,596
    807
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    Gainesville
    What a nasty libbie
     
  13. May 10, 2025 at 5:52 AM #33
    g8trjax

    g8trjax GC Hall of Fame

    5,371
    479
    293
    Jun 1, 2007
    Leftie women...:emoji_grimacing:
     
  14. May 10, 2025 at 5:59 AM #34
    BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    9,757
    1,023
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    [​IMG]
     
  15. May 10, 2025 at 6:22 AM #35
    BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    9,757
    1,023
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    I’d never read the rules, but that “approved website” list is especially stupid if random blue checks count. Who thinks that makes a lick of sense? I was going to reply in a thread, but the thread got whacked because it linked to Gizmodo!? That was it, “not an approved website”. Bizarre.

    I get that some posters like to spam from lousy sources for whatever reason. But maybe just deal with people who start troll threads rather than come up with cockamamie rules. Seems like instead of “approved” sources - have a much shorter list of “banned” sources (or perhaps just ban far left and far right sources, but accept “leans left” and “leans right” if it’s factually good). If anything X should NOT count. Although sometimes stories break and social media is the only thing we’ve got if a “real” written story hasn’t yet come out, so in those real-time situations it makes sense.
     
  16. May 10, 2025 at 6:37 AM #36
    vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    9,313
    1,327
    2,543
    Apr 8, 2007
    Who decides if “it’s factually good”?
     
  17. May 10, 2025 at 6:52 AM #37
    G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    5,830
    1,077
    553
    Sep 22, 2008
    Who decides if someone is here illegally?
     
  18. May 10, 2025 at 8:28 AM #38
    vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    9,313
    1,327
    2,543
    Apr 8, 2007
    Not sure what that has to do with the post that I responded to.
     
Page 2 of 2