Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Durham reveals Clinton lawyer lied to the FBI (Update: He was acquitted.)

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by gatormonk, Apr 5, 2022.

  1. g8trjax

    g8trjax GC Hall of Fame

    4,085
    266
    243
    Jun 1, 2007
    Yawn, the one prominent crooked political hack that gets convicted of anything will be the first.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. tampajack1

    tampajack1 Premium Member

    7,042
    1,029
    1,953
    Apr 3, 2007
    So Durham spends a ton of government money to charge a lawyer in private practice on a questionable lying charge. I have not followed the details, but here’s what it sounds like. The guy is working for the Clinton campaign and DNC. He comes across information that he believes needs to be reported to the FBI because of possible Russian interference in the U.S. presidential election. However, he has an ethical obligation to inform his clients. He lets the clients know, and they say go ahead. He then tells the FBI that he is submitting the information in his individual capacity, not on behalf of a client. That sounds correct to me. Not guilty.
     
    Last edited: May 31, 2022
    • Agree Agree x 5
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  3. rtgator

    rtgator Premium Member

    6,206
    528
    398
    Apr 3, 2007
    Are Batman and Superman involved? :)
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Creative Creative x 1
  4. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    10,996
    1,163
    708
    Apr 3, 2007
    That's clever
     
  5. Trickster

    Trickster Premium Member

    6,755
    1,678
    3,203
    Sep 20, 2014
    I’ll never understand why citizen Trump has not been charged with obstruction. Mueller detailed incidents of it!
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  6. Trickster

    Trickster Premium Member

    6,755
    1,678
    3,203
    Sep 20, 2014
    If it isn’t Trump, it will never be anyone.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Off-topic Off-topic x 1
  7. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    3,382
    242
    343
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    Would it shock you to learn that Sussmann had already tried to feed these allegations of an Alfa Bank Trump link to the NYTimes in order to get them to publish the story before approaching the FBI? And that Sussmann was trying to get the FBI to contact the NYTimes to hold off on the story so they could look at allegations, knowing that the NYTimes would then run a story about how the FBI was looking into the allegations? That way the story was not the allegations but the fact the FBI was investigating them?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • Creative Creative x 1
  8. tampajack1

    tampajack1 Premium Member

    7,042
    1,029
    1,953
    Apr 3, 2007
    No.
     
  9. mutz87

    mutz87 p=.06 VIP Member

    38,200
    33,767
    4,181
    Aug 30, 2014
    Manafort, Gates, Flynn, Papodopoulous, etc...
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    Apr 8, 2007
    • Funny Funny x 3
  11. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    10,702
    4,360
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    It is sad in this country that people will be manipulated by this. When Trump campaign was being investigated by the GOP appointed special prosecutor, he repeatedly referred to the angry democrats. As if there is a political litmus test. Flip the point: is membership in a political party a disqualification for service on a jury in an investigation that touches politics? Should the jury have just been Republicans? Under that level of scrutiny, the Defendant would complain he did not get a fair trial because the jury was Republicans. So, a free pass for everyone. Bear in mind, too, that there were 12 jurors on Sussman’s jury. Shame on Fox. But that is what draws in their viewers and readers. Read the article. It doesn’t even discuss the charge against Sussman— which was that Sussman lies about who he represented in connection with Alfa bank. Jarrett presents the trial as a referendum on the Clinton campaign’s use of the information.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. pkaib01

    pkaib01 Premium Member

    3,211
    593
    1,963
    Apr 3, 2007
    I think they have long demonstrated they are immune to shame.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. jhenderson251

    jhenderson251 Premium Member

    2,724
    306
    1,943
    Aug 7, 2008
    Just for the record, if anyone is still asking "how much longer are some posters going to be obsessed with Trump?!"

    The answer seems to be, "for at least 6 years after his political career dies."
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  14. gatorchamps960608

    gatorchamps960608 GC Hall of Fame

    1,851
    401
    1,963
    Jul 4, 2020
    This political prosecution idea of Barr's was part of a concerted effort that has largely failed so far to erase the Trump/Russia 2016 link.

    No one lied to the FBI. Most of the FBI investigators interviewed about this stated that they knew Sussman was a DNC lawyer, though ironically some didn't know what the DNC was. :rolleyes:
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 1, 2022
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  15. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 8, 2007
    Why am I not surprised? By the way Gregg Jarrett apparently decided that since he was indicted by Durham (technically the indictment of Sussmann was issued by a grand jury but as that famous legal scholar Joe DiGenova once observed (paraphrasing) a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich if so instructed by a prosecutor) he must be guilty. Although perhaps not technically Durham was a political appointee of Bill Barr and he was appointed to indict and prosecute.
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2022
    • Like Like x 1
  16. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    4,645
    1,036
    3,053
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
  17. rtgator

    rtgator Premium Member

    6,206
    528
    398
    Apr 3, 2007
    Why?

    Because SORE LOSER Donald won't just go away like other losers. He'd rather tear this country apart, LIE incessantly about nonexistent voter fraud, rile his deluded followers into a violent assault on Congress, try to overturn the legitimate election of his opponent, prepare to overturn the 2024 election by replacing honest election officials with MAGA sycophants, and turn the U.S into his own authoritarian third world country than admit that he LOST the election fair and square.

    received_2093149917502273.jpeg
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2022
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  18. rtgator

    rtgator Premium Member

    6,206
    528
    398
    Apr 3, 2007
    Would it shock you to know that Trump himself started the Russia Russia Russia story when he publicly asked Russia to interfere in the election on his behalf?

    Screenshot_20220522-142529_Google.jpg

    Would it shock you to know that Trump LIED to the American people about his financial ties with Russia?

    Screenshot_20210914-232729_Photos.jpg

    Would it shock you to know that there were numerous ties between the Trump campaign and Russia throughout the 2016 campaign and that the Trump people consistently LIED about those ties, resulting in several convictions. (The list below leaves out the part where Manafort gave campaign info to a Russian operative.)

    FB_IMG_1644955372751.jpg

    Trump has only himself to blame for the Russia Russia Russia story and subsequent investigations.
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2022
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  19. pkaib01

    pkaib01 Premium Member

    3,211
    593
    1,963
    Apr 3, 2007
    Short, layman's overview of yesterday's verdict:

    The Humiliation of John Durham

    I bothers me that Durham was tasked to find improprieties in the investigation into trump/Russia and tangible outputs seem to be limited to investigation of crimes during the investigation of the investigation (?). What a waste.

    "Durham could have departed then, too, and saved himself further embarrassment. After all, the month before, Durham had obtained his one and only conviction, a guilty plea from then-FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith for lying to investigators in June 2017.

    Still, a low-level FBI agent’s lie, nearly a year after the Trump-Russia investigation began, did nothing to prove that the FBI had launched the investigation illegitimately."

    "The supposed lie for which Durham indicted Sussmann occurred in mid-September 2016—again, after the Trump-Russia investigation started on July 31. Sussmann went to a friend in the FBI—the bureau’s general counsel, James Baker—with a tip, allegedly saying that he was not offering the information “on behalf of any client.”"
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  20. gatorchamps960608

    gatorchamps960608 GC Hall of Fame

    1,851
    401
    1,963
    Jul 4, 2020
    Since the mods love editing in this thread, can they change the completely incorrect thread title also?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1