Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

DHS Policy Confirms You Must Surrender Your Password

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by G8trGr8t, Jan 12, 2018.

  1. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    14,576
    1,082
    648
    Aug 26, 2008
    Anywhere within 100 miles of the border DHS can demand that you surrender your electronic device and the password. Kind of crazy and over the top imo. Puts most every inch of Florida under their arbitrary search and seizure.

    viewfromthewing.boardingarea.com/2018/01/11/us-now-says-can-keep-devices-border-wont-give-password/

    The US Department of Homeland Security released a new policy on border searches of electronic devices along with a privacy impact assessment.

    Courts have generally found a ‘border exception’ to the fourth amendment (including even 100 miles from a border) that allows the government to search and seize most anything it wishes without particularized suspicion.

    Existing policy however didn’t deal specifically with password protected and encrypted information, even though Customs and Border Patrol would detain people unless they turned over access to information on their devices.

    Now the US has formally adopted a policy that says, “travelers are obligated to present electronic devices and the information contained therein in a condition that allows inspection of the device and its contents.”

    The government says it can retain your password, examine your information, and even keep your laptop, cell phone, storage devices, etc. if they can’t fully inspect what’s on it.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
  2. GatorFanCF

    GatorFanCF Premium Member

    3,643
    366
    313
    Apr 14, 2007
    Bosco?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. oragator1

    oragator1 Premium Member

    14,232
    1,395
    948
    Apr 3, 2007
    Hey, gotta stop the illegals. If it means all of us giving up basic privacy protections we take for granted as a cornerstone of our democracy, why not? Jose is evil.
     
  4. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    14,576
    1,082
    648
    Aug 26, 2008
    has nothing to do with illegals and you know it
     
  5. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    4,685
    331
    273
    Apr 16, 2007
    [​IMG]
     
  6. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer Premium Member

    5,740
    973
    418
    Oct 30, 2017
    This is very misleading. The "border exception" is narrower than you're claiming.
     
  7. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    14,576
    1,082
    648
    Aug 26, 2008
    DHS has the authority to confiscate, copy, and search and electronic devices within 100 miles of the border. That is the DHS guidance just issued by them.

    https://www.dhs.gov/publication/border-searches-electronic-devices
    DHS/CBP/PIA-008 – Border Searches of Electronic Devices
    The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is publishing an updated Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) to provide notice and a privacy risk assessment of the CBP policy and procedures for conducting searches of electronic devices pursuant to its border search authority. CBP is conducting this PIA update to describe recent changes to, and the reissuance of, CBP’s policy directive governing border searches of electronic devices, CBP Directive No. 3340-049A, Border Searches of Electronic Devices (January 2018). CBP is conducting a privacy risk assessment of this updated policy as applied to any device that may contain information in an electronic or digital form, such as computers, tablets, disks, drives, tapes, mobile phones and other communication devices, cameras, and music and other media players. Noting the evolution of the operating environment since the 2009 Directive was issued, along with advances in technology and other continuing developments, CBP reviewed and updated its Directive January 2018 which supersedes the August 20, 2009 directive.

    https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/f...40-049A_Border-Search-of-Electronic-Media.pdf

    Older article here
    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016...n-confiscate-any-device-along-border-without-





    [​IMG]
     
  8. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer Premium Member

    5,740
    973
    418
    Oct 30, 2017
    DHS guidance doesn't overrule the Fourth Amendment.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  9. gatorpika

    gatorpika Premium Member

    7,356
    873
    408
    Sep 14, 2008
    The SCOTUS already ruled on the fourth amendment issue. They can search your car too at inland border checkpoints. Went through one in Arizona and had to stop, but no search. Not sure whether there would be an exception for someone randomly arrested at a mall or something that have never been across the border and asked to unlock his phone. As far as I know the "jury is still out" on the fifth amendment issue against self incrimination.

    https://www.technobuffalo.com/2017/03/21/fifth-amendment-password-protection/
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer Premium Member

    5,740
    973
    418
    Oct 30, 2017
    There wouldn't be, which is why I called your post misleading. There has to be some connection to the border. See, e.g., https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/413/266/
     
  11. gatorpika

    gatorpika Premium Member

    7,356
    873
    408
    Sep 14, 2008
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Spurffelbow833

    Spurffelbow833 GC Hall of Fame

    8,952
    546
    623
    Jan 9, 2009
    They'll do whatever they want to do. The frog died fifty degrees ago.