Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Dept. of State cites 38 people for wrongdoing in Clinton Email Probe

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by CaptUSMCNole, Oct 18, 2019.

  1. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    18,344
    1,145
    688
    Apr 3, 2007
    Some here are becoming more Trump-like every day....lie your ass off and deny the facts at will.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. flgator2

    flgator2 GC Hall of Fame

    1,329
    283
    383
    Apr 3, 2007
    Not really, it's pretty spot on.
     
  3. JerseyGator01

    JerseyGator01 GC Hall of Fame

    14,427
    140
    558
    Apr 10, 2007
    In other words, they were incompetent, but not deliberately so. Seriously, who else could get away with that? Two sets of laws in Lawyerland.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    11,647
    1,054
    848
    Apr 3, 2007
    Atlanta
    Its funny that the people on here who want Hillary thrown in jail are the same ones who feel the current occupant of the White House is above investigation for allowing his private lawyer (not a government employee but his private freaking lawyer, without any clearances) use of State Department assets to jet around the world and conduct a covert investigation of a political rival, and then threaten to hold up Congressionally approved aid if another country didn't cooperate.

    Or have no problem with his awarding the G-7 to a personal asset because he said the words "no profit", like there's really a moron in the world who believes that populating an asset that is otherwise only 30-40% historically occupied at the time won't result in "profit" to the owner. My guess is you don't have a business degree.

    Rick decrying a set of facts as "bunk" sums it all up. You guys don't believe in facts anymore.

    Party over country, but really Trump over party.

    It's the definition of hypocrisy.
     
    • Winner Winner x 7
    • Like Like x 3
  5. nolancarey

    nolancarey GC Hall of Fame

    1,229
    232
    228
    Aug 16, 2009
    It's as though you used the word "flgator2" to describe someone with whom you disagree. It's profoundly astonishing.
     
  6. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    6,060
    1,838
    713
    Nov 25, 2017
    they don’t seem to mind compelling documents witnesses to investigate democrats or HRC, but when Rick Perry, Pompeo, McGann ignore subpoenas, that is OK.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  7. fredsanford

    fredsanford GC Hall of Fame

    10,342
    371
    598
    Dec 1, 2008
    IMG_0118.JPG
     
  8. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole GC Hall of Fame

    3,575
    295
    288
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    So if you needed proof that this report is all about protecting the institution, it is that statement right there. That statement is false. Clinton had documents with portion classification markings on them, specifically “(C)” for confidential. She was specifically asked about that by the FBI. The Dept of State is playing games with definitions on this report to protect itself. They are claiming that a portion marking isn’t actually a classification marking, which is an extremely hard thing to claim with a straight face.

    @fredsanford - Out of curiosity, why are you putting in photos of Tweets and not the Tweets themselves?
     
    Last edited: Oct 19, 2019
  9. studegator

    studegator All American

    352
    104
    343
    Feb 24, 2008
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. fredsanford

    fredsanford GC Hall of Fame

    10,342
    371
    598
    Dec 1, 2008
    IMG_0120.JPG
     
  11. Tjgators

    Tjgators Premium Member

    3,537
    288
    233
    Apr 3, 2007
    hopefully they get fired
     
  12. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    18,344
    1,145
    688
    Apr 3, 2007
    Along with the Trump kids.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole GC Hall of Fame

    3,575
    295
    288
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    It showed that the Secretary of State was using an on authorized unclassified server for her work email that had classified information on it.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  14. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    18,344
    1,145
    688
    Apr 3, 2007
    Breaking news, 2016 style.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  15. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    Apr 8, 2007
    Jeffrey Toobin expresses regret over 'mistakes' in Clinton email coverage
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  16. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    4,053
    499
    423
    Apr 16, 2007
    Now you have a traitor President literally taking direct action on advice from dictators, sending out shadow operators to work around our governments' normal diplomatic channels, seemingly even directly in conflict with actual U.S. national security interests.

    You're still stuck on "but her emails". Shame.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
  17. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    Apr 8, 2007
    It is a thread about the handling of the emails
     
  18. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    4,053
    499
    423
    Apr 16, 2007
    They didn't want to vote to censure Steve King of Iowa.

    But EVERY.SINGLE.REPUBLICAN voted to move forward on a motion to censure Adam Schiff - who just happens to be leading the impeachment investigation of the most criminally disqualified president perhaps in our entire history.

    I think that says it all.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    4,053
    499
    423
    Apr 16, 2007
    True. Of course he is the one responsible for starting this thread and thus wants to re-raise the emails issue. Hence, "stuck on emails".

    Based on posts, also not sure this guy thinks this is the "closing chapter" in the email saga. Trump sure doesn't.
     
  20. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole GC Hall of Fame

    3,575
    295
    288
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    None of the things you have listed are illegal. You might not like how Trump has run his Admin, and with good reason, but as POTUS all of the things you listed within his prerogative to do.

    Clinton had no authority or justification to have over 500 emails with classified information on a personal server. I realize that you might not think that is a big deal but I tell you the rank and file of the IC did. The topic of "What would have happened to us if we did that?" was much discussed during '15 and '16. So please spare me "but her emails."
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  21. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    Apr 8, 2007
    does the fact that the State Dept found no deliberate mishandling of classified material make the focus on emails a bit overdone?
     
    • Winner Winner x 2