Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Coronavirus in the United States - news and thoughts

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by GatorNorth, Feb 25, 2020.

  1. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    12,400
    22,074
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    Long since stopped monitoring this thread as the wall is too hard to keep beating my head against but saw this and found it interesting if it hasn’t been previously posted.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    17,390
    1,238
    798
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    Absolutely they do. They have from the beginning.

    Shoot most only need Tylenol and Ibuprofen if even that. Let alone the antivirals prescribed by a doctor.
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  3. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    16,898
    1,542
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    Link to the actual study for those who are interested:
    https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2101765

    BACKGROUND
    As mass vaccination campaigns against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) commence worldwide, vaccine effectiveness needs to be assessed for a range of outcomes across diverse populations in a noncontrolled setting. In this study, data from Israel’s largest health care organization were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine.

    METHODS
    All persons who were newly vaccinated during the period from December 20, 2020, to February 1, 2021, were matched to unvaccinated controls in a 1:1 ratio according to demographic and clinical characteristics. Study outcomes included documented infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), symptomatic Covid-19, Covid-19–related hospitalization, severe illness, and death. We estimated vaccine effectiveness for each outcome as one minus the risk ratio, using the Kaplan–Meier estimator.

    RESULTS
    Each study group included 596,618 persons. Estimated vaccine effectiveness for the study outcomes at days 14 through 20 after the first dose and at 7 or more days after the second dose was as follows: for documented infection, 46% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40 to 51) and 92% (95% CI, 88 to 95); for symptomatic Covid-19, 57% (95% CI, 50 to 63) and 94% (95% CI, 87 to 98); for hospitalization, 74% (95% CI, 56 to 86) and 87% (95% CI, 55 to 100); and for severe disease, 62% (95% CI, 39 to 80) and 92% (95% CI, 75 to 100), respectively. Estimated effectiveness in preventing death from Covid-19 was 72% (95% CI, 19 to 100) for days 14 through 20 after the first dose. Estimated effectiveness in specific subpopulations assessed for documented infection and symptomatic Covid-19 was consistent across age groups, with potentially slightly lower effectiveness in persons with multiple coexisting conditions.

    CONCLUSIONS
    This study in a nationwide mass vaccination setting suggests that the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine is effective for a wide range of Covid-19–related outcomes, a finding consistent with that of the randomized trial.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    13,635
    1,005
    2,038
    Jan 5, 2022
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  5. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    13,635
    1,005
    2,038
    Jan 5, 2022
    If it escaped from a lab, how did that happen ? Did someone leave the back door open after Uber Eats delivered ?

    If it was a bioweapon, what piss poor weapon is said to have killed the frail elderly primarily ?

    It’s just a misdirect for the lack of any evidence of virus and it just keeps the fear narrative alive.

    2020ff, like perhaps no other period in our lifetimes, starkly illustrates how depressingly easy it is to frighten people into herds.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  6. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    83,086
    24,620
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    All I want to know is, since when is it even legal to work on gain of function on deadly pathogens?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  7. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    13,635
    1,005
    2,038
    Jan 5, 2022
    They would probably have you believe they’re tinkering with viruses, to make them more virulent, so as to learn how to control deadlier virus.

    Of course the problem is that you have to have a virus to begin with.

    I believe the reason lab leak is so captivating because we know that toxins are deadlier than viruses are believed to be. They kill directly and in short order.

    But if you can concoct something like a toxin which spreads from person to person ...
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  8. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    83,086
    24,620
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    • Informative Informative x 1
  9. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    11,596
    1,461
    2,868
    Jan 6, 2009
    Yeah I have mixed feelings about this. I understand the theoretical benefits of doing so, but at the same time people are people and the incompetence of any particular individual can never be underestimated.

    Whatever we do or don’t do probably has no bearing on what countries like China and Russia do, so there is that. Do we want to be in the game, or just leave it to them and hope for the best?
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  10. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    83,086
    24,620
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    Exactly, it even mentions an Anthrax leak at the CDC that infected several people. And I haven't seen and need to make these deadlier strains of pathogens, either.
     
  11. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    11,596
    1,461
    2,868
    Jan 6, 2009
    The flip side example is the thread of the H5N1 bird flu out there. As is it is highly lethal. If it jumps to humans, or perhaps we should say when, there is the possibility that it makes Covid look like a walk in the park. If you could engineer it and create vaccines ahead of time you could perhaps reduce the harmful impact.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  12. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    83,086
    24,620
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    I need to read up on that, haven't seen any article on it yet.

    Here's a blurb on it.


    https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2023-02-06/nepal-detects-h5n1-bird-flu-on-farm-woah-says
     
  13. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    13,635
    1,005
    2,038
    Jan 5, 2022
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  14. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    11,596
    1,461
    2,868
    Jan 6, 2009
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  15. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    4,801
    951
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    As with anything, it is legal until a government makes it not.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    28,343
    11,195
    3,443
    Aug 26, 2008
    Offensive side vaccinates itself, spreads virus and waits
     
  17. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    11,596
    1,461
    2,868
    Jan 6, 2009
    That’s a pretty dangerous strategy and Covid proves that. For fast incubating and mutating diseases like coronaviruses and flu you practically can’t stop spread, you can only slow it and reduce the worst impacts.
     
  18. ncargat1

    ncargat1 VIP Member

    13,722
    5,935
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    Why do you equate gain-of-function with more deadly?