So UT would be better than 1st in the country in offense and AR would be better than the Heisman favorite. Ok then. I guess that settles that. I...
Mullens scheme got guys open
I still can’t get over this thread Most college teams and most SEC teams would gladly swap QBs with us. Gladly. He will be a first round pick...
Heupel is an offensive genius. His teams will be near the top of offensive output regardless of recruiting. Who knows about defense. Of course...
AR is projected to be a first round pick. Hooker isn’t close. If AR and Hooker swapped places Tennessee would be even better and Florida would...
Hooker is ok. AR is much better. We are actually more talented than they are on offense. It is all about scheme
He is still rated as a mid 1st round pick at QB. These threads are beyond ridiculous
We didn’t whiff. Those guys don’t want to be co DC with Toney. We didn’t make a serious attempt
Innovative offensive system Their talent isn’t that great. That is the scary thing.
You mean zone defense where the underneath layer is 15 yards off the ball and behind the 1st down while the back end remains 30-40 yards off the...
The defensive goal are to maximize the % of stops. First punts and then field goals. I guarantee all out blitzing and playing man would get more...
The league can see how limited our offensive scheme is. He is often forced to make tight window throws while on the move. Not easy. The thing AR...
Other key is we do a poor job in disguising coverage. It allows other teams to run pretty straight forward beaters on our coverage. Combine that...
None of that can explain why we we are dead last compared to P5 and G5 teams. Your argument is legit if we were talking #50 rather than #130
There is where talent vs coaching is an interesting topic. Miller is a pretty good but flawed player. He has deficiencies, mainly in coverage. A...
Nobody is claiming we are the most talented D. We are literally last in 3rd down D. Near last in punts created. Even if we aren’t top 10 talent...
An undefeated P5 will get in over a 1 loss SEC.
I think the opposite, it’s too basic. We rarely disguise coverage and we run similar things over and over.
Against a decent OC (and system) if the coverage is that obvious they will just run beaters on you. So you have to disguise coverages somewhat....
1 loss SEC > 1 loss anything else
