No. Not repeal. Maybe tweaked with more clear instructions for the court. The majority of problems from these laws comes through judicial...
I didn’t say it was an IQ test. But the suggestion that the end result can’t happen here is beyond naivety. Wacky wokeness is a virus, just like...
Yes. I would use the word, unjust, not unfair. Next question.
yNothing you just posted resembles what I am trying to teach you. Go back and read my example about the crime against the black lesbian teacher....
You think the government in Michigan is smarter than the government in Canada, Sweden and Australia? [img] have you read the comments from the...
[img]
Literally, every single person on this forum is not protected by the bill in everyday life. I think what you’re really asking me is what groups...
…and this matters why….. ??
You are wrong. You were wrong when you first made this claim and I calmly corrected you. Now you have just repeated the same wrong claim. How...
coming to a Michigan town near you….. Teacher jailed for contempt of court after refusing to use student's gender-neutral pronouns Street...
read the comments from the Dems who wrote this bill. I believe you will come to see you are wrong. Only time will tell. But, if they try, the...
Your misconception of the law is exactly what I thought. Your assertion is not how that type of law works. You ask “Can you give me an example...
You ask who’s not covered? I told you the list of the shit out of luck crowd would be everyone not included in section A-I of section 147(b)(2)...
But everyone and every group is not covered. That is one of the problems. Only listed groups are covered. People have hate and commit crimes on...
OK, thanks for actually answering my question. Now, as someone who has actually written legislation, I will ask you the next obvious question on...
Oh no, a drive by terrorist attack. Whatever shall I do? [IMG]
New America F-yeah video...
The irony here is you questioning my reading comprehension, while simultaneously reposting my questions to you, which you once again failed to...
you seemed to have glossed over the point you keep acknowledging: if all groups are covered, then why have any groups? Are all groups protected...
