Yep. Noticeably absent from the list was Canada and Mexico. I guess they decided not to invent numbers for them like the 16 random countries that...
Nope. We export very little to some of these countries that are extremely small or poor. These numbers appear to be pulled out of somebody's rectum.
They appear to be completely made up. There is no basis for what these numbers are. For example, the UK charges, on average, about 1.0% as a...
Well, the markets are going to love the 10% tariffs on everybody and elevated tariffs of 30-40% on Asia and 20% on Europe on entirely made up numbers.
Neither are racial slurs. And yet, racial slurs are "racial" by definition.
Some people substitute the term for an ethnicity (Hispanic). They aren't using it as a nationality. The judge in the link I provided to you was...
Well, then there is your answer to the question that you asked: Can you name a single republican/conservative policy that treats people by race?
And yet, a lot of Republicans use the term as a generalized racial term for Hispanics, many of which aren't from Mexico. See, for example:...
Would you prefer Republican opposition to banning the practice at a federal level or the times in which local Republicans have either supported...
And yet, they do. How many legal residencies in this country have been canceled in the last month and a half? I think we are approaching 1...
That is pretty much his thing on here. Basically, parrot Trump talking points while in bad faith claiming that he doesn't like Trump.
Can you point out a single time in which you have opposed that logic in that context? Regardless, if the US government says that gun...
This dum-dum thinks that illegal businesses pay tariffs: [img]
That has literally been the Republican claim for years. But, banning something is a specific policy proposal. It would be reasonable to say that...
Wisconsin is one of the only 10 states that matter in the election of a President. So 40 other states are heavily governed by the preferences of...
That is an absurd definition. By that logic, nobody opposes anything, some people just want to cut things to non-existent. Favoring heavy...
"Tighten down on" legal immigration is simply a more positive framing for opposing legal immigration.
You didn't look much then. Legislation cutting legal immigration in half: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/02/us/politics/trump-immigration.html
Translation: you are okay with lobbing unsupported allegations at legal immigrants to make their neighbors hate them.
Legal Haitians do a crummy job and the VP accuses them of eating their neighbor's dogs. So yes, it seems like they have an issue with legal...