[ATTACH]
[MEDIA]
Russia has lost access to CERN in a sign that its war in Ukraine is causing a major scientific brain drain Another small move to contribute to...
Nefarious is not a word I would use, no. I just think temporarily lowering oil prices is not the purpose of the SPR, and Presidents (all of them)...
That's how the wheels started to come off in Afghanistan. The mothers and wives. And there are lot more women whose sons and husbands won't be...
Not quite. Since a constitutional amendment already requires a veto-proof majority in both Houses, the President plays no role. Unless my history...
Sure, propose an amendment to the Constitution. I’ll support it, and so will a lot of people. But understand the last time we, the people,...
This article, found in 30 seconds, says the last release happened in May of this year and makes no pretense about it being a national security...
Let’s keep this very simple. What was Biden’s purpose in releasing oil from SPR? What was the compelling national security issue the action was...
I assume Russians are still able to deploy glide bombs but have not heard about any successful glide bomb attacks lately. Certainly, the...
I don't know. Is it? Sounds like a healthy debate to have for the legislation that I propose should specify when a President has the authority to...
As long as you also have no problem with another President -- say, Trump -- also using any and all of the national security tools their disposal...
Maybe, but the real limitation in that regard seems to be not (yet) having all of the long-range munitions an F-16 can employ and/or not (yet)...
Every SPR transaction this year has been "right before an election." And it isn't relevant, in my opinion, whether he made profits on it or not or...
The answer is not to eliminate it. The answer is to legislatively restrict Presidents from using it except in ways that affect our national...
I’m not really interested in how this move would affect our domestic politics. I am very interested in how it would hurt Russia at a critical...
I didn’t say they would. I’m only suggesting that it’s not uncommon to change rules a generation later.
Personally, I never underestimate Tennessee’s ability to find ways to lose this game, no matter how much they “should” win.
So a group of people then? What one group of people in 1991 can decree, another can undecree in 2025.
I don’t have to imagine. There are lots of books out there about 1914 and 1939. Should I recommend a few?
