Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Israel strikes Iran (Update: US Bombs Iran at #848)

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by g8orbill, Jun 12, 2025.

  1. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    19,480
    1,346
    2,188
    Jan 5, 2022
    So only ‘thirdly obliterated’ ?

    Another revelation is that US Central Command (CENTCOM) "had developed a much more comprehensive plan to strike Iran that would have involved hitting three additional sites in an operation that would have stretched for several weeks instead of a single night, according to a current US official and two former US officials."

    US Strikes Destroyed Only One Of Three Iranian Nuclear Sites: Intel Assessment | ZeroHedge
     
  2. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    10,064
    2,336
    1,733
    May 31, 2007
    Land o' Lakes, FL
    Iran will no longer pretend to work with the IAEA. I really think that's better for everyone.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    4,856
    506
    433
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    A COCOM will always come up with alternative COA's based on the guidance they get from the CG, SecDef, or POTUS. This is not unusual.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    10,345
    1,428
    2,793
    Apr 8, 2007
    But easy to tell if they start digging at those sites
     
  5. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    10,552
    1,389
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    I think someone posted that we’ve already seen satellite images of them doing that?
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  6. GatorBen

    GatorBen Premium Member

    6,727
    1,167
    2,968
    Apr 9, 2007
    If that’s the case, I’d be interested to know whether that may have been effectively our goal (to send the message that we can take out anything we want whenever we want).

    We successfully destroyed Iran’s most fortified and supposedly impenetrable nuclear site - the one that had people seriously asking in the days before our strike whether it was actually possible to do significant damage to it with anything short of a tactical nuclear weapon. And there was some contemporaneous reporting that our original intent had been to strike only Fordow, and that we added the other two as additional targets at Israel’s request.

    Given that, it seems unlikely that we’re capable of completely destroying Iran’s most difficult to damage target, but simultaneously tried and failed on the far less-fortified ones - which suggests to me that our primary goal may have been to take out the one that no one else can and send the message that we have the ability to destroy anything they build, but did not want to go all in on destroying everything we could.
     
  7. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    10,552
    1,389
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    It’s a good theory. Not sure we’ll ever know.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    10,345
    1,428
    2,793
    Apr 8, 2007
    well they used different methods to hit the different sites. Seems like they perhaps weren't aware of the Isfahan site be buried so deep. Perhaps a bunker buster could have been used there as well.
     
  9. chemgator

    chemgator GC Hall of Fame

    15,307
    2,196
    1,318
    Apr 3, 2007
    More Iran news: Northern Iran is facing such a severe water shortage (from drought, global warming, etc.) that they may have to move the entire population of Tehran (15 million) somewhere else. One of their largest reservoirs is expected to run dry within a month.

    MSN

     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2025 at 6:29 PM
    • Informative Informative x 4
  10. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    19,480
    1,346
    2,188
    Jan 5, 2022
    On to rapacious states that actually possess nukes, when are we going to bomb Israel’s sites ? I don’t understand the holdup.
     
  11. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    16,468
    5,693
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Kabul too
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    4,352
    895
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    12% of Gaza is stage 5 famine. There comes a point… where you’ve made your point. Hamas needs to go, but the death of child to hunger and starvation breeds a hate that is beyond Hamas’ wildest fantasy.

    “JERUSALEM — Israel has begun to airdrop food into Gaza, Israel said on Saturday, as deaths from starvation in the besieged enclave spread this week and international criticism of Israel’s restrictions on aid reached a crescendo.”


    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/07/26/gaza-airdrops-resume-starvation-israel/
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2025 at 10:05 PM
  13. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    4,856
    506
    433
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  14. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    4,856
    506
    433
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  15. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    10,345
    1,428
    2,793
    Apr 8, 2007
  16. ATLGATORFAN

    ATLGATORFAN Premium Member

    4,268
    1,130
    2,153
    Aug 10, 2015
    So Hamas has transitioned their military strategy from letting their civilians die as a result of being human shields for Hamas’ weapons and fighters to allowing their civilians die by not allowing them to eat. All for the sole purpose of hoping the civilized world blames Israel because they know they cannot defeat the IDF and it’s their only path to anything they consider victory. Sadly, there are people out there that still buy into this propaganda.
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Agree Agree x 2