It's interesting how that "witch hunt" narrative takes root. I'd be interested to know what you consider to be a "witch hunt."
And yet, at least according to the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee, clearly there was collusion. .... a Senate panel concluded Tuesday as it detailed how associates of Donald Trump had regular contact with Russians and expected to benefit from the Kremlin’s help. The nearly 1,000-page report... says the Trump campaign chairman had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer Among the more striking sections of the report is the committee’s description of the professional relationship between former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and Konstantin Kilimnik, whom the committee describes as a Russian intelligence officer. “Taken as a whole, Manafort’s high-level access and willingness to share information with individuals closely affiliated with the Russian intelligence services, particularly Kilimnik, represented a grave counterintelligence threat,” the report says. Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election
Sorry, linking the Weismann Report is not the answer. How did the Trump Campaign actively collude with the Russians when it came to the DNC hack and the IRA social media acts? Since your belief is apparently very firm that it happened, you should be able to describe how it happened.
And There's been non-stop news from this Admin since it began. There's been no noticeable uptick in news from admin. ...just the Left trying desperately to get back to the one and only story they seem like they could get any traction on. This ain't Doh! Biden's twice a year poke your head out of the ground for 2 secs, then duck back for cover admin. Try n keep up. Iran nuke program... nuked... BBB...passed... NATO agreed to contribute more, AND to buy our weapons for Ukr, rather than Doh! Biden's open check book, with zero accountability... Isreal and Iran agree to ceass fire... ALL, in past mo, and b4 Bondi's Epstein screw up blew up...
Admittedly cheesy coming from POTUS... ...if same POTUS hadn't been actually subject to actual attempts to incarcerate, by Barry's protégé puppet.
The left lost its sense of humor after hillary lost, and its worst nightmare materialized in Trump win... and its only gotten worse since he won again, after they threw everything and the kitchen sink at him, + >1 billion dollars... and STILL got pasted! LOL!
I mentioned Manafort and he was ditched. Again, to believe there was collusion you have to have a much higher opinion of the collective "wisdom" of MAGA than I do. Sort of like January 6. You say "insurrection". I say that the word "insurrection" implies a level of intelligence and competence that was clearly absent that day. So I go with "drunken riot" instead. In other words, MAGA and "Wisdom" are mutually exclusive terms and I doubt there were enough collective brain cells in that group to manage any kind of real "collusion" anyway. Again, if anything, the Russians were so far ahead of MAGA on these things that any "collusion" by MAGA would likely have been counterproductive.
As some of us said day 1, the Mar-a-Lago raid was to see what evidence Trump had on Them. The Mar-a-Lago raid paves the way for Clapper, Brennan, Comey, McCabe etc to be tried in South Florida (before Judge Aileen Cannon?). Problem: Bondi lacks courage and intellect so don't expect much
Hey AI, were there a lot of voters on the fence during the 2016 presidential election? Yes, many voters were undecided or "on the fence" leading up to the 2016 election, contributing to the election's unpredictability. Factors such as the unpopularity of both candidates and late-breaking news events influenced voter decisions in the final days of the campaign. Were trump's two opponents in two elections women? Yes, Donald Trump ran against two women in presidential elections: Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Kamala Harris in 2024. He won against Clinton but lost to Joe Biden in 2020, while Harris was his opponent in the 2024 election trump can't win against a pasty white guy. What are you dummies hitting the disagree button disagreeing with???
So no answers to my questions? That is who actually oversaw the development of the report and made the decisions on what went in to and what did not. Why shouldn’t it have his name on it?
That was not the name of the report. You can call it by its name rather than try to figure out who is the mastermind behind the report. As for not answering your questions, I was answering your questions, but they just go on and on. I am still working for a living.
It is not hard to figure out that Mueller was not the person actually in charge of the investigation. Weissmann was the #2, so he was clearly in charge. This is not hard to figure out. So the report should be called by the name of the person that was in charge. Or are you trying to say that Mueller was actually in charge and running the day to day operations of the investigation? These are easy questions to answer. Here is an example: What did the Trump Campaign get out of the Trump Tower meeting with the Russian lawyer?
They were probably disagreeing (as i lol'd) at the part about a dem dude winning. The dems have wrecked their man cred horribly, and every effort by Tampon Timmy, Gavin the ultimate stick your finger in the air politician (and most transparent), Barry (just... Lol!) trying to feign manliness for the man vote, just keeps exacerbating the wreckage, rather than making up any lost ground... Go ahead and parade your next girly man in a skirt--perhaps one who swims against girls....or a real live cowboy, if you can convince one to run for the dems... Won't make a lick of difference. ...but that's my guess as to why you got those disagrees (and my funny) on that post. (That shit was funny! --to me anyway)...
My point is all the dems need is a pasty white guy because this is the biggest crap show of an administration in the history of our country. Go along now, I think they are playing red rover over there.
Of zero concern or pertinence. The Trump campaign tried (per the report) to get damaging info. That in itself may be called conspiracy. We know you want to defend, defend, defend but your points from your obvious biased position do not outweigh the Senate Committee and Mueller.
Again, please show me any intelligence cited in either report that shows that the Trump Campaign was actively communicating with the Russian government. All you really get is that the Trump Campaign was too incompetence to figure out how to contact the Russians. If you want to cite the Senate Committee report, I give that way more credibility than what Weissmann put out in his report. So if the Trump campaign is guilty if they were trying to get damaging information from the Russians, I would assume you would feel the same way about the Clinton campaign. Seeing as the Clinton Campaign actually hired a native Russian, that the FBI believed was a Russian Spy and were about to get a FISA warrant for, to dig up damaging information on Trump and the Russian government was aware of her campaign asking for that information.
Going all in ... it is funny how quickly they move when Trump gives them marching orders. Benny Johnson and Mike Flynn suggest a military tribunal for Obama should be explored Mike Flynn says Obama's passport must be revoked and his home raided by federal authorities
This is all just a hoax related to Trump's ODS. When Trump brings up Obama you know that Trump's snowflake level is at a 10
