Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

War in Ukraine

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by PITBOSS, Jan 21, 2022.

  1. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,994
    2,331
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Land o' Lakes, FL
    Whoever you’re responding to likely does not accept ISW as a valid source. It’s sort of like citing radiometric dating data to a Young Earth Creationist. I’m not sure how one argues against “Carbon 14 dating is a trick of the Devil! You can’t trust it! It proves nothing!”
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
  2. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,994
    2,331
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Land o' Lakes, FL
    Huh. I thought we were going to go with ye olde “Yeah, well, in modern warfare, ‘air superiority’ is not really a thing” canard.*

    * That Israel just pulled off the “air superiority” thing, with Western equipment against Russian equipment 1000 miles and two unallied countries away from its home bases, is not relevant because it does not fit the narrative.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  3. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    4,690
    488
    403
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    It’s funny how certain aspects of combat are “no longer a thing” when the Russians cannot achieve them when they go up against our 30 year old tech.But the moment our more recent and other 30 year old tech goes into battle, they are able to achieve those things that are supposedly no longer possible.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,994
    2,331
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Land o' Lakes, FL
    Indeed. Air superiority is no longer a thing. Combined arms is no longer a thing. Maneuver is no longer a thing. Centers of gravity and critical vulnerabilities are no longer a thing. Strategic logistics is no longer a thing. Integrated targeting and intelligence processes are no longer a thing. Disciplined initiative is no longer a thing …
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    19,313
    1,339
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    I didn’t realize they were this big!

     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    24,460
    2,103
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    Donald Trump blasts "a lot of bullsh*t" from Putin
    Anyone willing to wager whether Trump will go beyond verbal criticism of Putin and actually ramp up military assistance to Ukraine including providing Ukraine with more air defense assets as well as other military equipment? Maybe it's just me although Trump talks a good game my guess is that he is still so intimidated by Putin that he doesn't actually take substantive action. Reversing what Bill said in another thread, unlike Joe Biden when it comes to Vladimir Putin Trump lacks the balls to stand up to the Russian.
     
    Last edited: Jul 8, 2025 at 1:55 PM
    • Agree Agree x 2
  7. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    8,939
    973
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
    i wish we knew why Trump is so reluctant. So far he isn’t updating sanctions which is needed as Russia changes methods to an acquire materials. Or letting Ukraine buy patriots that will help save lives.
     
    Last edited: Jul 8, 2025 at 3:18 PM
  8. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    24,460
    2,103
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    Two explanations and they're not mutually exclusive. One is that Putin really does have something on Trump that would embarrass him personally, maybe it's the so called "pee tape" mentioned in the Steele dozier or maybe it's something else. The other explanation is that Putin has stronger personality than Trump and the Donald is simply intimidated by him. It's been frequently said the Donald Trump is a weak man pretending to be a strong man, both senses of the term.
     
  9. homer

    homer GC Hall of Fame

    3,278
    968
    2,078
    Nov 2, 2015
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    24,460
    2,103
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    Was going to post the same. I have to admit that I was very pleasantly surprised. Now the question is to what extent will Trump resume the arms shipments and will he continue to do so until Putin agrees to a ceasefire, complies with the ceasefire and seriously negotiates for an end to hostilities rather than conditioning an end to war upon near total capitulation by Ukraine.
     
  11. thomadm

    thomadm VIP Member

    3,298
    767
    2,088
    Apr 9, 2007
    Who knows what's in that small brain of his. If I were in his position, I'd threaten Putins life and potentially bomb Russian forces in eastern Ukraine, which was our original agreement between Russia and the US before Putin came to power.
     
  12. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,994
    2,331
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Land o' Lakes, FL
    Emotionally, I agree with the sentiment. But our “original agreement,” most certainly did not specify the use of armed force against Russia to protect Ukraine’s sovereignty. President Clinton did not have the authority to sign up future generations for war by executive agreement. That would have taken a treaty that specified war powers as the North Atlantic Treaty does.