Pam Bondi Fires Three Jan. 6 Prosecutors

Hilarious.

No, it's not the media's fault that Trump encouraged violent riots, watched them approvingly, insists that people lie about them, and PARDONED 1500 violent rioters.

There's either condoning the J6 violence by lying about it. Or, well ..... not. And you've made clear which side you're on. That shows what you support, not opposition to .....the bad ole media.

 

Hilarious. You literally said something -this below- and now can't back it up. So now you're off on some series of glitches. The goalposts are actually RIGHT HERE; substantiate your false statement please. Here it is;

- "It's flat out goofy to claim that no democrats support violent riots."

Also, who "called you MAGA"? Are you just making (more) stuff up now? I'd ask you to show where somebody said that, but .... well, we know how that would go.

 

I missed where Democrats were participating in riots. That was actually part of my original request that you substantiate. I'd like to know what you apparently know.

(And never mind that the J6 riots were created by the literal leader of the Republican party, insisted on being lied about by him, and perpetrators pardoned by him. So definitely not "both sides.")

 

I have no idea of their political affiliation, tbh I think they were probably apolitical criminals and hoodlums who just showed up to riot. Do you have some evidence I'm not aware of?

Actually, since there is a documented history of Republicans violently rioting, if we had to guess it would make more sense to assume that those people were Republicans.

And no, I have no recollection of anyone here, or anywhere that I saw, condoning violent acts. Do you have evidence of this?

On the other hand, we do see people here regularly lie about, support, and otherwise make excuses for the J6 riots. Which, of course, were incited by the lies of a sitting President!! (And why was a losing presidential candidate holding a rally after the election on certification day, if not to incite violence?

So clearly ..... both sides are not equal. One, in fact, is so shockingly criminal and un-American that they should probably be banned from politics until they purge themselves of that un-American criminality.

Instead they pardoned the criminals and lie about it. It's actually insane how many people tolerate that.

 

So you have no evidence to support your claim that Democrats support violent roots? I see.

But MAGAs who repeat Trump's J6 lies and support a President who instigated riots, watched them, and pardoned rioters are no different than these fictional Democrats?

It's really just the "fringes" of both sides that are bad, (such as the sitting President who every MAGA cast a vote for)?

One day you'll recognize how abhorrent it is to support this dishonest un-American criminality ...... and apply that standard to people who do so. Instead of calling their norm a "fringe" in order to turn a blind eye to it.

 

"Hate for people?" Weird.

Nah, I just hate seeing the most un-American criminality since the Civil War. I hate seeing people tolerate it because ..... well, who really knows why? Why would people tolerate a sitting President inciting a riot and attack on our government while trying to overturn an election?

Refusing to judge tolerance of that is literally refusing to judge crime. It's not about "hating people."

There's an expression: "Hate the sin, not the sinner." You should get some help trying to understand that.

 

Will do, that seems reasonable.

I will say though; it poses a challenge when I we see some of them tell outright lies about literally crimes that we all saw , and we see other ones just.... pretend they didn't or don't see those lies get told.

Strange scenario when so many people are knowingly part of a pretty far-reaching conspiracy to distort what the actual truth is, on so many things.

I'll try to be nicer to those people though.