Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

POLL: If you were President, what option would you choose?

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by OklahomaGator, Jun 19, 2025 at 10:45 PM.

If you were President, what option would you choose?

  1. Do nothing, let Israel take care of it.

    5 vote(s)
    20.8%
  2. Drop enough bunker buster bombs to eliminate the site at Fordow and let Isreal finish it.

    10 vote(s)
    41.7%
  3. Throw every diplomatic effort into regime change and an agreement for no nuclear weapons ever.

    9 vote(s)
    37.5%
  1. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    126,768
    165,043
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    Choices are from a podcast that @CaptUSMCNole provided in the Israel attacks Iran thread. The choices are really not that simple but wanted to boil it down to simpler choices.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  2. ncargat1

    ncargat1 GC Hall of Fame

    15,028
    6,435
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    None of the above.
     
  3. slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    4,239
    883
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    None of the above. Go to Congress and present your case on the record to the American People. But, we all know he is incapable of following the Constitution and War Powers Act.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 2
  4. ncargat1

    ncargat1 GC Hall of Fame

    15,028
    6,435
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    Better yet, tell that criminal Netanyahu you will cut off all military support if he bombs Iran. Let Bebe go finish his corruption trial and actually try to negotiate in good faith with Iran. The bombs aren't going anywhere, if nothing comes of it, you can still level Iran in 3-6 months.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 4
  5. GatorBen

    GatorBen Premium Member

    6,664
    1,143
    2,968
    Apr 9, 2007
    As I have noted on here before, every single presidential administration since it was passed has taken the position that the War Powers Resolution is, at least partly, unconstitutional. That’s the reason they submit the congressional reports with the statement that the report is being made “consistent with” the War Powers Resolution rather than “pursuant to” or “as required by” the Resolution.

    And very nearly all, if not all, administrations since it was signed have violated it (if you believe it’s valid and applies). Obama and Clinton arguably had the most obvious “violations” of it (the Libya bombing campaign that the Obama administration outright ignored the deadlines and requirements then contended that complying with them “was not required” since the U.S. forces were under the direction of NATO; and Clinton’s position that congressional authorization for the bombing campaign in Kosovo was unnecessary - despite Congress having specifically rejected an authorization of military force - because the DOD appropriation included funds to support contingency operations in Kosovo, notwithstanding that the Resolution itself says that appropriations shall not be inferred to constitute congressional authorization).
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  6. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,777
    1,860
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    I voted 2, based on the limited info I have.

    One question I have is what are the potential consequences for the US if we dropped the bombs? Do the Iranians have resources to attack and do damage to American interests in a significant way?

    At this point I have a hard time imagining that we can do a deal with the current regime and trust it. Any sort of deal will make concessions to Iran and give it time to get in a better position than it is now. If we are going to do this, we may never have a better time.

    If regime changes happens, great, maybe, but based upon our experience that’s not a great path for us, as it rarely turns out well.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    9,945
    1,051
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    There really is no good choice, and choice 3 is more wishful thinking than a choice. “Diplomacy” resulting in regime change? Uhhh… unlikely. Perhaps the Theocracy of Iran can be so weakened that the people can finally rise up. I don’t like the idea of our govt fomenting coups, but I am sure most of the world outside of perhaps Russia and NK want to see the demise of that maniacal Iranian govt.
     
  8. g8orbill

    g8orbill Old Gator Moderator VIP Member

    130,994
    60,923
    114,663
    Apr 3, 2007
    Clermont, Fl
    When dealing with Middle Eastern Countries appeasement never works- the only thing they seem to understand is total annihilation. I would drop 2 or 3 MOAB's on Fardow and then back off and tell Netty the rest was on him.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    9,968
    1,385
    2,543
    Apr 8, 2007
    Iranian proxies certainly have the means to attack US interests
     
  10. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    4,455
    435
    393
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    This post shows a fundamental lack of understanding about the psychological part of warfare. What Israel has achieved in the last week is probably the greatest surprise attack since the Tet Offensive. Whether you like Bibi or not, what the Israeli Military and Mossad have been able to achieve over the last week has completely thrown the Iranian leadership for a loop. They are off balance, scared, and have no idea who to trust. The Supreme Leader is said to have been taken out of the decision making process because he is so distressed and scared. This created a window of opportunity that is not going to occur again if Israel stops and waits a couple months to resume the bombing. Any action to take out that nuclear site has to happen in this window to offer the best chance of success and lower the risk to force for the military attacking it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  11. Tjgators

    Tjgators VIP Member

    5,594
    757
    458
    Apr 3, 2007
    Iran is formidable, and the Israelis practically choked them out in short fashion. How they did it is an amazing story. Sneaking into Iran to build drones and use them to take out rocket launchers while killing everyone in charge. Put that story with the pager story, and you have some of the most unbelievable war stories I have heard. Forcing the bad guys to use beepers, manufacture knock-off beepers, insert bombs, and get the Hezbollah beeper contract is big-screen worthy.

    Let's not forget this was all provoked by Iran (Hamas, Hezbollah, and Houthis) on Oct. 7th. Israel is not raping Irans women and children. They don't chant death to Iran in the Knesset, but they do chant death to Israel/USA in the Iranian Parliament. I'm not sure what is going on in that deep, deep bunker, but I would think they are trapped and can't accomplish much. There are 92 million people in Iran. We do not want to displace the citizens of another country. I don't believe the US will be dropping any bombs. I do think we will continue to kill any leader that steps up, and eventually the Iranian people may have a chance to take back their country. Maybe a pipe dream, but I think you have to aim for that first.