No, he lumped his boss into the 25-year window of bad foreign policy. By accident. This is really easy to understand, don’t get why you don’t get it.
Take the SOB Mullah regime out. They have never been weaker: Iran Warns US About Direct Involvement The SOB is hiding yet he continues to warn the freedom loving countries involved in this conflict while threatening to expand his missile attacks against other oil producing countries:
I assume there are less missiles launched everyday. I heard a couple of missiles got through the Iron Dome but did not cause any damage. The cycle of the news stories and timezone makes it difficult to figure that out exactly. Last night they were showing the mass exudes of tehran as well as striking of F-14s but I saw those pictures 2 days ago. There was a news story I saw mid day yesterday on Fox news where they broke down the number of missiles launched in order to come up with an estimate of how many missiles Iran might have. Of course they acknowledged that they have no clue how many have been destroyed in Iran. I think they game up with around 700 missiles left.
The answer is obvious, based on sources I know and who listen exclusively to me. In the year 832, the Phillistines purposely attacked a Roman enclave, but blamed the Egyptians. Because the Phillistines are from the present land of Israel, all of the experts in the know agree that this was the prelude to present day Israel attacking one of the most powerful United States Navy’s mobile force strike (if not the most powerful) in order to trick the US into entering a War in which the US is already providing extensive cooperation and aide. Duh.
You forgot … sending drones and missiles at Israel (and recently extensively against the Saudis, and of course against the US) with drones and missiles supplied by Iran. Sure. No connection there between Iran and the Houthi’s — who have been funded and armed and trained by Iran to rise against the Yemen government and wage war on Iran’s historic religious enemy, Saudi Arabia). It’s all just a terrible misunderstanding.
Because he serially blankets the boards with disinformation, and readers who may nit participate with frequency might read a selective post, and think it’s reliable. It’s important and necessary to debunk the messaging-over-facts propaganda. I’m grateful for the posters here who do that.
Besides what @ajoseph mentioned, if you are not really paying attention, his posts have a patina of credibility until after you scratch the surface and see who it comes from and their actual backgrounds.
I get that. But pretty comfortable that the majority in this board know what he is. I admire you calling him out and appreciate it on some levels… but think it’s a waste of time and giving him legitimacy/ attention he so desperately craves and yet he doesn’t deserve. With that said.. continue on. I guess someone has to do it and you seem well qualified
I disagree a little with what Ajoseph said. Each individual should be responsible for his own decision making .No one needs be or really should be the defender of all truth on the board. Just my two cents. If someone jumps on the board and falls for his a brick… which speaks poorly of that persons iq .. then he/she is responsible for finding the truth.
I know I am not trying to be the “defender of all truths.” This is a message board. But the majority come here to read and debate opinions and views, and we do so with the expectation that we will all engage in good faith belief that our views are factually supported. The general integrity of dialogue is why this forum is so robust in its diversity of thought, and why it makes it so entertaining and interesting. But when it is perceived that a few intentionally spread disinformation, I think it’s appropriate to point it out, particularly because the baseline poster expects the discourse to be good faith views.
Who are you all arguing with, that Russian Fox guy? Weird, thought everyone was wise to arguing with him by now. Makes perfect sense that he'd be 24-7 anti-Israel - Russia is perhaps Iran's strongest backer. Now it is interesting that no resident MAGAs minded (mind) him when he was (is) spouting his pro-Trump/pro-Russia lines. Politics -and election tampering- sure does make for strange bedfellows. (Of course it's also awesome to see Trumpies go from "no new wars" to "kill Iran", just because their reality TV guy got so thoroughly boxed in and played by Netanyahu, and doesn't want to admit it. But that's another story. )
But at the same time, being a well informed person, you knew what he meant and that foreign policy was better during his first term then undone during Biden's term. If you meant Vance needs to communicate more clearly for the benefit of the uninformed electorate, that's reasonable.
Well said. That being the case I placed that poster, our vaccine wacko and a couple more on ignore some time ago. I enjoy a factual based discussion and found none with those.
Old definition of antisemite: People who hate Jews Modern definition of antisemite: People Jews don't like
