they won't strike, but what I'm saying is the fans they should fund themselves like they do in highschool or better yet the multitude of colleges that dont have football yet have sports programs. How did it become football's responsibility
Because it allows the law firm of Shark Sheyster & Shark to ask for a huge pool of money that they get a percentage of all at once while the actual victims usually end up with very little.
A home run show that benefited MLB, providing a massive windfall to the owners, the networks and everyone associated with the game and when it was over they threw McGuire over the side of the boat. The man deserves to be in the HOF, along with (even though I don’t like him) Barry Bonds and Roger Clements.
All cheaters. Just because they allowed them to cheat doesnt make it ok. Hank is still the hr champ in my book.
That's a tough topic for me personally. I was so enthralled with the whole home run record chase, but, when it became obvious that it was really a steroid arms race, that bothered me a lot. I'm okay with Pete Rose getting into the hall of fame because his mistakes didn't make him play better. But, steroids did make the other guys better. Records in baseball are a sacred thing and the PED era has destroyed that. I would still vote to keep those steroid guys out of the HOF (if I had a vote).
When the NCAA releases any statement like this: "the NCAA said in a statement Wednesday. 'The NCAA is moving forward with implementing the settlement injunction to deliver this massive win for student-athletes.'" you can bet that they smell the money and that some (a lot?) college athletes are about to get royally screwed over.
IMO, Title IX seems to dictate you need some women's sports teams to balance men's teams on an equitable basis. I can see keeping men's football baseball basketball and track, along with women's softball, soccer, track and maybe one other sport to make it equal. i don't think we can support all teams and be able to keep competitive teams in the major sports if we keep all teams. Sports like gymnastics, golf, tennis, etc which don't bring in money would be difficult to support on an equitable basis. It would have helped if they allowed an unequitable distribution of money to the athletes based upon revenues to the school generated by the sport.
The simplest of solutions, and should be implemented ASAP: Football is NOT the same as all the other sports (including men's basketball) and so the SEC for all the remaining sports is exactly that: IN the southeast of the USA. Under NO circumstances should a men's golf team travel to Missouri or Oklahoma for a "league" event. That is just plain silly. Make football a "sponsored" sport and not a part of the rest and so it IS a minor league of the NFL - and make it age restricted, say no one older than 24 when their birthday is before November 1 - and then the remaining sports can be "subsidized" by the revenue that football generously "re-invests" into the university that "sponsored" it. And then the numbers work out great. Other than the blatant professionalism in all the sports from now on, if you have to "administer" fairness with college funds, this is the only way. JMHO