Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ will lead to Medicare cuts: CBO

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by G8tas, May 22, 2025 at 10:06 AM.

  1. coleg

    coleg GC Hall of Fame

    2,371
    844
    1,903
    Sep 5, 2011
    Perhaps all those people on Medicaid and SNAP should hurry to sell their stock portfolio while it's up? Is that where you're going?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    126,427
    164,918
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    No I was replying to a post that said the market was down 800 points this morning, now it's up.
     
  3. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    8,711
    931
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
    Good below was removed. Fortunately, it impacted Repub districts. That’s the only reason they took it out. Slows for now Trump’s degrading our parks and allowing more pollution.
    Just one more area he’s making our country worse.



    “They removed the sections that authorized the sale of hundreds of thousands of acres of public lands in Nevada and Utah. Some Republican lawmakers from Western states had objected to the sales.”

    https://apnews.com/article/trumps-b...requirements-20a4cce877bdb411056578139e405986
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. coleg

    coleg GC Hall of Fame

    2,371
    844
    1,903
    Sep 5, 2011
    Yes, I knew your true intent. Was just going with a little cynical/humorous snark.
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  5. dynogator

    dynogator GC Hall of Fame

    6,943
    377
    418
    Apr 9, 2007
    Maybe, but only one party wants a shiny new flying palace. And a multi-million dollar birthday parade. And lives bigly on taxpayer money. Anyway, doesn't the deficit always go down under Democratic administrations?
     
  6. dynogator

    dynogator GC Hall of Fame

    6,943
    377
    418
    Apr 9, 2007
    Trump is an unrepentant liar. He's said many times that the social entitlements wouldn't be touched, except, of course, reductions in fraud, waste and abuse. Does he expect to find $800 billion in FW and A? Because that's how much his Big Beautiful Bill cuts from Medicaid. Deceitful, dishonest, deplorable Donald.

    Those other times included during a Feb. 18 interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity, when, while referring to Medicaid and Medicare, Trump said, "None of that stuff is going to be touched."

    "We're going to love and cherish Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid," Trump also said in the Oval Office on Jan. 31. "We're not going to do anything with that, other than if we can find some abuse or waste, we'll do something, but the people won't be affected. It will only be more effective and better."
     
  7. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    4,087
    316
    393
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    Which party wanted a Green New Deal with a 6 Trillion price tag?

    No, it does not. The Obama Admin budget deficit the last year was higher than the last year of the Bush Admin. If you exclude the two COVID years of '20 & '21, the Biden Admin deficit ended up being $.9T higher in '24 than the Trump deficit in '19.

    Fiscal Data Explains the National Deficit

    Both parties have a spending problem. As @ufhomerj31 stated, we are better off as a country when there is divided government. The deficit tends to shrink when the that happens.

    U.S. Presidents and the Federal Deficit
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2025 at 4:03 PM
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  8. exiledgator

    exiledgator Gruntled

    12,313
    2,346
    3,128
    Jan 5, 2010
    Maine
    I don't agree that a thread about executive overreach should be combined with a thread about Medicare budgetting. (this post was its own thread that was merged into this one)

    These are two completely different topics regardless of the fact that they're in the same bill and I think they should be discussed separately on their own merits.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  9. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    6,619
    2,021
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    Welcome to the Big Beautiful Thread.
     
    • Funny Funny x 6
  10. dynogator

    dynogator GC Hall of Fame

    6,943
    377
    418
    Apr 9, 2007
    You can't be comparing a multi-decade, planet-saving program with Trump's grotesque personal expenditures. That would be like comparing lightning bugs with lightning.

    The deficit numbers by parties are pretty much a wash when averaged, but it's instructive to look at recent deficit increases: Trump raised it by 7.1 Trillion in his first term, Biden by 2.8 Trillion.

    I agree wholeheartedly with the desirability of a divided government. I prefer a Republican (non-MAGA) president and a Democratic Congress.
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2025 at 6:04 PM
  11. ufhomerj31

    ufhomerj31 GC Legend

    792
    126
    143
    Jan 5, 2010
    I don't know how real this is, but let's say it is relatively accurate. US clearly has a spending problem and the need to cut first, and maybe raise taxes slightly. We can't keep adding to the deficit like a drunken sailor on shore leave.

    Defense budget needs to be cut 5-10 percent.
    Health care needs to be overhauled, we simply spend to much there. Every other category needs at least a trim. Where's DOGE?


    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    4,087
    316
    393
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    We'll have to agree to disagree on the Green New Deal. I'm sure we probably need to do the same on the Golden Dome.

    Trump also had COVID spending in his last couple budgets, so we are kind of comparing apples to oranges there.
     
  13. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    5,973
    1,093
    553
    Sep 22, 2008
    A provision "hidden" in the sweeping budget bill that passed the U.S. House on Thursday seeks to limit the ability of courts—including the U.S. Supreme Court—from enforcing their orders.

    "No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued," the provision in the bill, which is more than 1,000 pages long, says.

    The provision "would make most existing injunctions—in antitrust cases, police reform cases, school desegregation cases, and others—unenforceable," Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of the University of California Berkeley School of Law, told Newsweek. "It serves no purpose but to weaken the power of the federal courts."

    Why It Matters
    The provision would prohibit courts from enforcing contempt citations for violations of injunctions or temporary restraining orders—the main types of rulings that have been used to rein in President Donald Trump's administration—unless the plaintiffs have paid a bond, something that rarely happens when someone sues the government.


    'Hidden' provision in Trump's big bill could disarm US Supreme Court

    Looks like they are looking to give the POTUS even more power.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  14. jhenderson251

    jhenderson251 Premium Member

    3,489
    605
    2,043
    Aug 7, 2008
    So let’s assume this bill with that provision gets passed into law.

    What prevents the USSC from ruling it unconstitutional?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. coleg

    coleg GC Hall of Fame

    2,371
    844
    1,903
    Sep 5, 2011
    We are staring at one current bill increasing the total National debt by nearly 10%. The deflections do nothing to change that.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  16. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    5,973
    1,093
    553
    Sep 22, 2008
    Nothing, but I would argue what prevents one from ignoring the USSC?
     
  17. g8orbill

    g8orbill Old Gator Moderator VIP Member

    130,115
    60,521
    114,663
    Apr 3, 2007
    Clermont, Fl
    I am sure that provision would be looked at by the SCOTUS
     
  18. cocodrilo

    cocodrilo GC Hall of Fame

    17,054
    1,036
    1,708
    Apr 8, 2007
    In Trump's unAmerican America, nothing.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    Ultimately nothing but good faith. Trump's entire aim is remove people of good faith from positions of power and replace them with people who are loyal only to him.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  20. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    5,973
    1,093
    553
    Sep 22, 2008
    Don't pretend that you now care about court rulings