Morality and ethics are not determined by stories. Morality and ethics are determined by moral law, a moral law you demonstrate competent knowledge of when you condemn the partiality of racism. You know partiality is unjust. Your posting history gives an abundance of tangible evidence that you know partiality is wrong. Don’t deny a truth you’ve clearly given evidence of believing in.
Her comment from 8 years ago. Ok, here are some JD Vance comments that also hit “the nail on the head” (JD Referring to Trump). “Maybe the Central Park 5 could take out a full-page ad to condemn the coddling of thug real estate barons who commit serial sexual assault” “I think that he’s noxious and is leading the white working class to a very dark place.” “My god what an idiot”
I did not know that was 8 years ago, but that doesn’t change how disgraceful the comment is. That seems like a red herring to change the subject from the OP.
Loberals grooming kids to accept the immigration of millions of Muslims because it's been so good for Europe?
Would this be considered ‘inciting language’ ? "Racism Is Only White" – Anti-White Art Installation Goes Viral, Sparks Outrage | ZeroHedge
The start of that crippling ESG, and other crap like 1609, DEI BS? Part of Obama's plan... his "fundamental change" in America.
You will search the globe for art installations like this in France and other trivialities to try to feed your confirmation bias.
"If you put 100 black ants and 100 red ants in a jar, nothing will happen, but if you shake the jar, the ants start killing each other. The true enemy is the one shaking the jar. The same thing with human society. So, we should think about who is shaking the jar!" But how are all those different ants getting put into the same jar in the first place?
Do you have any sources for those claims that I bolded in your post? I would like to take a look. The article you linked doesn't cite any source for those claims.