I am a two-time Illinois alum (MS and PhD) and while it has been a LONG time since the Illini won a national championship in football (they have 5!) and they essentially invented collegiate football as entertainment (Red Grange) they have ZERO national championships in basketball unless you want to count the 1943 Premo-Poretta Power Poll or a 1915 title of dubious veracity. Heck, UK would claim them both but I don't. They came close a couple of times but never did it. When I was a grad student at Illinois they were decent in basketball (Lou Henson era) and for the most part horrible at football (they missed having a perfect losing record one year ending the season to an equally pathetic Northwestern football team with a 0-0 tie) until they had a coach named Mike White (not that one!) that cheated and they won some football games. So I claim that Illinois is a basketball school with ZERO national titles and not a football school with FIVE national titles. Whatever it is it won't be easy for them to win a natty in either sport.
This is the content for which I come to this site. Good discussion, no one getting testy. Baseball not in the OP question but I think the toughest for reasons above. The number of possessions with scoring opportunities is far greater in BB which makes it a more volatile sport. Comebacks like our ‘25 BB team kept making would be tougher in football. Not scientific but seems important to me so I’d say from an unpredictability perspective basketball is tougher.
But I think this is skewed because it doesn’t include the percentage to make the 12 team playoff (vs 68 team tourney)
I’m gonna just add to this, because I agree with all that is there. Further, football requires the good fortunate of the roll of a football at the opportune time. Football, with so many complimentary pieces all needing to work together, also has more parity than basketball, because of the volume of players on the field and the roster. Football requires the navigation of a grueling schedule, with the good luck of the injury gods, and opponents who are, generally speaking in each conference, equally invested. And with 12 teams now in the playoffs, vs the 4 we’ve become used to, e have more competition, more room for error and upset, and more money to guide future parity. Now take this in perspective to what Saban did, and it is simply astonishing.
Here ya' go. For playoff games: Basketball Std Deviations Winner Score - 9.57 Loser Score - 10.12 Scoring Margin - 9.74 Football Std Deviations Winner Score - 6.56 Loser Score - 6.58 Scoring Margin - 7.33
Basketball is harder especially for a football school. Most of the ressources, financial or academic support goes through football first then to other secondary sports next.
Interesting. Now if we look at the scoring margin as a % of the average score per team it's 9.74/75 pts per game avg (per team) in college basketball, it's 13% of the avg team's score....vs in football it's 27.5 points per team average or 7.33/27.5 which is 26.7% of the avg team's score So as a % of the average points scored, the avg scoring margin in football is double that of basketball
**UCF has entered the thread** In all seriousness, what makes the school's retro 1915 title any less valid than their 1914, 1919 or 1923 retro titles? 1914 - 2 retro selectors 1919 - 5 retro selectors 1923 - 7 retro selectors 1927 - Dickinson (all other championship claims from this season should be wholly dismissed...whomever may have claimed them ) 1951 - Boand (split title by formula); Tennessee was the official consensus national champion that year (AP and Coaches). Coincidentally, Tennessee was routed by undefeated Maryland, but the championships were awarded before the bowl games back then. Go GATORS! ,WESGATORS
History shows the following: Football schools don’t win basketball NCs. Basketball schools don’t win football NCs. UF excels at both.