Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Some ideas for Trumps next 100 days

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by g8orbill, Apr 29, 2025 at 7:42 AM.

  1. g8orbill

    g8orbill Old Gator Moderator VIP Member

    129,544
    60,056
    114,663
    Apr 3, 2007
    Clermont, Fl
    • Like Like x 3
  2. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    11,831
    1,484
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    Will probably go as well as his first 100 days promises, like ending the Ukraine war, “liberating” us with tariffs, improving the economy, deporting millions of immigrants, and finding trillions of dollars in fraud….

    Trump is a worthless fraud.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Wish I would have said that Wish I would have said that x 1
  3. slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    4,087
    868
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    1. Water czar — on its face, seems like a good idea to have coordinated water policy. But, not sure the purpose. What is the remit and how will it be measured?
    2. Tax bill - Jason Smith will get this done. It’s just a matter of time. The deficit will be massive increase.
    3. health insurance — this is a weird one. The ACA opened this door to standardized regulation. Very few states signed on. So, what will happen is the insurance lobby will go to the lowest common denominator state regulator and it will make healthcare worse. The devil’s in the details.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  4. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    16,715
    13,404
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    shipping Schiff, Pelosi, et al off to El Salvador. Think of the ratings.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Creative Creative x 1
  5. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    9,163
    1,315
    2,543
    Apr 8, 2007
  6. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    17,896
    2,313
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Remember when Conservatives used to claim that they cared about the deficit? Yeah, apparently, that was a lie. See the above.
     
  7. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    90,428
    27,252
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    9,986
    1,292
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    Nobody actually wants to pay more taxes. If you’re being responsible you recognize we need to cover our expenses. We’ve shown that reducing expenses isn’t feasible (plus DOGE’s colossal failure) so we need to increase income. There are limited levers here. If not tax increases how do you reckon we pay our expenses and not continue to run up the deficit?
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 2
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  9. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    17,896
    2,313
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Okay, how are you planning to pay for fire, police, roads, schools, parks, and all other local services?
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 3
  10. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    5,733
    1,062
    553
    Sep 22, 2008
    How about bring prices down and end the war in Ukraine on Day 1....err I mean 101. Like he promised
     
  11. chemgator

    chemgator GC Hall of Fame

    14,818
    2,120
    1,318
    Apr 3, 2007
    Why does the U.S. need a federal water czar? There is not a single corner of the U.S. that is incapable of managing its own water supply, with the possible exception of Flint, Michigan (pop. 82,000). And if you are going to have a water czar that monitors every small town in the U.S., you are creating a very large and redundant department of the federal government, adding billions of dollars in waste.

    This sounds more like Trump trying to take away power from the EPA and their crazy "water quality standards" that are keeping his precious businesses from polluting the country for profits.

    Do we also need a federal sanitation czar? A federal dog-catcher czar? A federal HOA czar? Where does this foolishness end?
     
  12. chemgator

    chemgator GC Hall of Fame

    14,818
    2,120
    1,318
    Apr 3, 2007
    Trump's tax cuts add big bucks to the federal deficit. Maybe you wouldn't mind if a large percentage of government employees lost their jobs in order to bring the federal deficit back in line? Or would that concern you?
     
  13. archigator_96

    archigator_96 GC Hall of Fame

    4,259
    3,669
    1,923
    Apr 8, 2020
    DUH... Tariffs of course :D ..(runs and hides)
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
  14. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    16,715
    13,404
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    Privatize all of it. Can't pay, you don't play. House catches fire, you are out of luck unless you pay your feudal lord for protection.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  15. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    9,163
    1,315
    2,543
    Apr 8, 2007
    well when they tried to get rid of government employees, everyone all of a sudden seemed be up in arms. Cant play both sides of the fence here.
     
  16. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    9,163
    1,315
    2,543
    Apr 8, 2007
    For starters I would focus on entitlements. Get rid of fraud and then either increase the age or make people pay more into it by removing the caps.
     
  17. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    17,896
    2,313
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    So...by raising taxes. Cool. Playing both sides of the fence here.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  18. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    31,846
    2,083
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    Now that he's tanked his approval and signed laws that you could count on 1 hand during the honeymoon period, now is definitely the time for even more unpopular ideas that have no chance of making their way through congress.
     
  19. gator_jo

    gator_jo GC Hall of Fame

    4,050
    395
    248
    Aug 9, 2024
    Bingo. But to be fair, he did trot out that ole Trumppublican stand-by "get rid of fraud."

    That's a fun code word strategy that the pro-gun lobby uses for "pretend at this, but in reality do nothing."

    It's also fun to see all these welfare queens who want a lot of stuff but don't want to pay any taxes. Just let someone else foot the bill, right? It's the Trumpy way.
     
  20. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    9,986
    1,292
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    Here’s an interesting Sankey diagram of our federal budget. By my reading Social Security is -$200B annually out of a $1.8T deficit leaving another $1.6T to cover. About 30% of that is a delta in Medicare income/payments. I’d be interested to know why there is such a large delta. Regardless, I don’t see where you trim enough to cover the deficit without increasing corporate and personal income taxes.

    US government spending, budget, and financing | USAFacts | USAFacts
     
    • Informative Informative x 1