Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

UPDATE: Ahmaud Arbery's 3 murderers all found guilty. Sentenced to LIFE in prison.

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by orangeblue_coop, May 5, 2020.

  1. LouisvilleGator

    LouisvilleGator GC Hall of Fame

    1,180
    189
    1,933
    Oct 16, 2012
    Which is probably why the owner didn't bother. It's a waste of his time, because the police aren't going to do anything about it. McMichael probably even told him this. I don't know about where you live, but up here, even in higher end neighborhoods, burglars almost never get apprehended. It's a waste of time to file a report, other than your insurance claim. The most the police will do is perhaps patrol a few more times a day down that street for a week or two. Most business owners simply don't have the time to waste on unproductive activity.

    You also continue to frame this as though I'm saying the McMichaels had just cause under the law to pursue Arbery. I am not saying that at all. What I am saying is that just because it's a misdemeanor and not a felony, doesn't mean Arbery didn't place himself into a bad situation. And I hope for the sake of my liberal friends here that if they have children, they will teach them that it doesn't have to be a felony to put themselves into a precarious situation. And that's all I've been saying all along. If the McMichaels are found guilty, so be it. They too put themselves into a bad situation they did not need to be in and could very well spend a long time behind bars for it. But we already knew that. I have zero remorse for them.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  2. helix

    helix VIP Member

    6,553
    6,150
    2,798
    Apr 3, 2007
    Not sure if it's been posted here, but qualified immunity is increasingly becoming an issue as a ramification of a SCOTUS decision

    For cops who kill, special Supreme Court protection

    The distinction between legally in the right, morally in the right, and what actions are situationally prudent bears repeating.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. kygator

    kygator GC Hall of Fame

    2,983
    128
    348
    Apr 3, 2007
    This is correct. I know in my neighborhood we'll go through periods of time (usually when school is out and the weather is nice) where people keep searching through parked cars at night. People will complain about it to each other but most don't call the police unless something valuable is stolen.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Distant Gator

    Distant Gator GC Hall of Fame

    5,160
    571
    478
    Apr 9, 2007
    Upstate, SC
    Great summary AZ. One question- was Arbery going for a run, or not?
    Runners were encouraged to run 2.23 miles Friday in honor of Arbery, and post to FB. Which I did.

    And now a contratrian FB friend has contacted me saying that he wasn't going for a run after all.

    I should say that whether he was jogging or not doesn't change anything for me.
    I would do the same thing because this deeply disturbs me. (The part I bolded from your quote.)
     
  5. AzCatFan

    AzCatFan GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 9, 2007
    Arbery's family said he liked to run, and the McMichaels said they had seen Arbery running in the neighborhood before. Suggests that Arbery did enjoy jogging.

    Also, had the owner of the house tod the McMichaels about the people coming in, I would imagine the house owner would have said nothing was ever stolen from the site. The looki-loos may have been a nuisance, but not really dangerous, and not costing the home owner anything as all they did was look.

    Arbery wasn't some hardened criminal who'd spent years in jail on serious charges. He'd made some mistakes in his past, but that didn't have to define him his whole life, which was ahead ofv him. But the McMichaels only saw a black guy who was looking in a house under construction, who then left jogging down the road, and assumed the worst. So they hunted down and killed him.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. LouisvilleGator

    LouisvilleGator GC Hall of Fame

    1,180
    189
    1,933
    Oct 16, 2012
    Yeah, see, this is what irks me. You automatically assume the absolute worst about the McMichaels. But you give all these possible outs for Arbery, that don't really change anything. And anybody who has watched the surveillance video inside the home and thinks Arbery was just admiring the construction on the inside of the house is being incredibly naive.

    If you want to say the McMichaels are murderers, fine. But all these excuses and spin narratives for Arbery are dumb. Did the McMichaels screw up? Probably so, but don't tell me Arbery didn't place himself into a compromising situation. That is a joke.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 12, 2020
    • Like Like x 1
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  7. WESGATORS

    WESGATORS Moderator VIP Member

    21,908
    1,076
    1,808
    Apr 3, 2007
    No body cameras. I'd make them mandatory for any officer that wants to carry a firearm.

    Go GATORS!
    ,WESGATORS
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  8. homer

    homer GC Hall of Fame

    2,289
    669
    2,078
    Nov 2, 2015
    Agree.

    Nothing better than video and audio (if also available)
    It protects both parties.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  9. orangeblue_coop

    orangeblue_coop GC Hall of Fame

    3,473
    591
    2,938
    Nov 19, 2016
    Ever notice how the Zimmerman's, Michael Drejka's and McMichaels of society somehow manage to only initiate and engage in situations with unarmed individuals? I'm sure if these "concerned citizens" really wanted to, they could find a local drug deal going on to try and bust, or an armed robbery going on at a local convenience store. Instead these gun-wielding fake cops always stumble upon unarmed men. Very brave of them:rolleyes:
     
    • Agree Agree x 8
    • Like Like x 2
  10. LouisvilleGator

    LouisvilleGator GC Hall of Fame

    1,180
    189
    1,933
    Oct 16, 2012
    Yes, they have laser vision that allows them to know beforehand that their target isn't packing.
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 2
  11. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    9,116
    870
    1,468
    Apr 8, 2007
    The fact you call the other people their "targets" says it all.
     
    • Winner Winner x 7
    • Wish I would have said that Wish I would have said that x 1
  12. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    17,521
    1,220
    1,513
    Apr 8, 2007
    I suspect that if Zimmerman and the McMichaels actually thought that their targets were packing they would have called the police rather than take the law into their own hands.
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. orangeblue_coop

    orangeblue_coop GC Hall of Fame

    3,473
    591
    2,938
    Nov 19, 2016
    Of course they wouldn’t approach. Straight up cowards.
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
  14. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    14,143
    5,096
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    The clearly established element is a disaster. It needs to be broadened or removed entirely. The idea that officers don't understand something is illegal just because their particular method of violating rights or that particular factual situation is novel is a silly notion.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. AzCatFan

    AzCatFan GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 9, 2007
    The McMichael's actions ended up with someone dead who didn't deserve to die. Why should I give them any benefit of the doubt? While possible the owner of the home under construction talked to the McMichaels, the McMichaels never said any such conversation took place. So it's unlikely it ever happened.

    So you have two guys, father and son, who see someone take a look in a construction site and then run off and they figure he must be a criminal committing a felony? Add in the father and son are white, and the person jogging is black and how can you not see it as the father and son racially profiling the black man?

    To make matters worse, the father and son arm themselves, get in a truck, and hunt down the black guy. And as a result, the black guy is dead.

    Yes, I assume the worst about the McMichaels because their actions tell a very loud story of racism and assuming the worst about Arbery, who at the time was simply jogging in the neighborhood and at worst, committed misdemenor trespassing. Arbery deserved to be treated better. The McMichaels initially got off and were going to get away with their misdeed if it weren't for the video that will ultimately end in justice for Arbery.
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
  16. helix

    helix VIP Member

    6,553
    6,150
    2,798
    Apr 3, 2007
    100% agree. I get the idea that police are in stressful jobs and have to make some really tough life and death split second decisions. That said, they sign up for that job and sign up to put themselves in that position. Your average citizen not engaging in any sort of nefarious or criminal behavior does not. Until we start holding them to a higher standard of care and require them to seek alternative courses of actions, we will continue to implicitly endorse actions that result in preventable deaths.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  17. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    14,143
    5,096
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Yep. Assess the reasonableness of their actions through the eyes of a reasonable officer in those circumstances. We don't need any stupid "clearly established" test. It only serves to protect bad actors who were "first."
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. antny1

    antny1 GC Hall of Fame

    3,943
    2,012
    2,498
    Dec 3, 2019


    Just some things to think about. Personally I hope they charge them with manslaughter because I dont think they will get convicted of murder.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1
  19. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    17,521
    1,220
    1,513
    Apr 8, 2007
    A more likely scenario would be a charge of murder followed by a plea agreement in which they're allowed to plead to manslaughter.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  20. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    28,023
    11,109
    3,443
    Aug 26, 2008
    big difference between the 2 cases. Zimmerman was not trying to stop or arrest anybody. He was following and was assaulted and defended himself. Imo, these 2 cases are not comparable for that reason.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 2