Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Businesses are passing along tariff costs, Fed reports

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by G8tas, Jul 19, 2025 at 4:03 PM.

  1. 108

    108 Premium Member

    18,469
    1,333
    1,313
    Apr 3, 2007
    NYC
    Who would have thought..

     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    6,575
    1,189
    553
    Sep 22, 2008
    Why does Trump hate America?
     
  3. snatchmagnet

    snatchmagnet Bring On The Bacon Premium Member

    2,933
    559
    2,088
    Apr 3, 2007
    Parts Unknown
    I deal with aluminum LME, what is steel through?
     
  4. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    10,549
    1,389
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    We saw this coming so we bought as much steel as we could possibly store from Cleveland Cliffs and others the first couple weeks of January before Trump’s inauguration. We’re going to have to buy steel again in Q3 unfortunately, even if only a relatively small amount.
     
  5. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    10,549
    1,389
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    Not sure what you mean? A company like Cleveland Cliffs is completely vertically integrated.

    There’s the CRU that will tell you prices for rolled steel. We are a big enough player we never pay those prices since we negotiate big buys, but it gives you pretty good cost data.
     
  6. snatchmagnet

    snatchmagnet Bring On The Bacon Premium Member

    2,933
    559
    2,088
    Apr 3, 2007
    Parts Unknown
    I guess cru might be what I’m talking about then. We buy from several different anluminum extruders. It’s all based on LME or Midwest plus conversion. The LME is what it is, the conversion rate is what seperates them. I wasn’t sure how steel works. It would seem kind of vague to say aluminum went up x amount. That’s just not how it works. Wasn’t sure about steel.
     
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2025 at 9:23 PM
  7. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    6,773
    2,056
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    Steel has been protected for 150 years under the commie arg of "national security". 1-3% of domestic steel is used by the military. Oh, & the military grade steel bought mostly from 2 plants in Penn is protected (as it prob should be) by the Defense Production Act.

    Stupid ass policy - & we should all be in agreement. I will say Trump "allowing" the Nippon deal to go through - a total no-brainer - is a good thing. the fact that a president could stop it is gross!

    I used to recall when fake conservatives at least but a tad of value on freedom. Now it's security, security, security. As if free(ish) mkts haven't been primary driver of security.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. snatchmagnet

    snatchmagnet Bring On The Bacon Premium Member

    2,933
    559
    2,088
    Apr 3, 2007
    Parts Unknown
    Agree with that, as well.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  9. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    10,549
    1,389
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    The company we just sold at the start of the year bought tens of millions of pounds of aluminum from Korean extruders annually. We always negotiated prices with them. I don’t think the LME was ever used directly for pricing but as an argument to say they could get it cheaper. Part of why we didn’t use the LME directly is that we bought not just extruded profiles but had them fabricated and painted too so the price per pound included labor too.
     
  10. snatchmagnet

    snatchmagnet Bring On The Bacon Premium Member

    2,933
    559
    2,088
    Apr 3, 2007
    Parts Unknown
    We are in that ballpark as far as volume, we just buy mostly domestic and powder it in house. I guess my point was that the only thing that separates any extruder is their conversion rate. It’s just added on top of the LME and Midwest. That’s the number you pay. Aluminum got tariffs just like steel did but it’s not like it just went up 25 percent. That’s not how it works. It’s a traded commodity
     
  11. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    10,549
    1,389
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    Yeah, steel is the same way. If you look at the steel index the price literally shot up the week Trump was inaugurated before any tariffs were enacted. It’s off its recent highs right now though. I literally just received an update on the CRU and in the last week galv is down .9% and hot rolled coil up .1%. Both peaked in March, have fallen probably 15% since, and have been relatively steady since the start of June.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    6,575
    1,189
    553
    Sep 22, 2008
    Do you ever plan to show us why it's not true?
     
  13. DesertGator

    DesertGator VIP Member

    4,602
    2,363
    2,013
    Apr 10, 2007
    Frisco, TX
    Disagree with the policy all you want (I happen to as well), but it's actually quite the opposite of "hating America". The tariffs are doing precisely what tariffs were designed to do. Push the behavior of American consumers away from foreign imports to domestic products by increasing prices of those foreign imports. Of course businesses were going to pass the increase to its customers. That's basic economics. It's a similar scenario as with minimum wage. When the government adds a price control of some sort, it flows down to all levels of consumption.
     
  14. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    6,575
    1,189
    553
    Sep 22, 2008
    That would make sense if the tariffs were targeted on specific goods, but they are not. Clothing and shoes are not something that we are going to be able to produce in large quantities. We even placed tariffs on a country that doesn't exist. Why do we have tariffs on bananas and coffee? Finally, I thought all of this tariff BS had to do with fentanyl...or was it immigration...I honestly don't think he even knows
     
  15. DesertGator

    DesertGator VIP Member

    4,602
    2,363
    2,013
    Apr 10, 2007
    Frisco, TX
    Again, I'm not arguing the policy. Personally, I think gov't intervention in what is supposed to be a free market is a recipe for disaster. I won't argue (I agree) that the execution of it has been haphazard and lousy. But poor execution does not equate to hating America. By that logic, more than half the teams in the NCAA are hated by their coaches because their execution is poor.
     
  16. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    127,028
    165,182
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    I do see how the tariffs will contribute to inflation, but it will be a one time effect. If something costs $100 and has a 20% tariff, the new cost will be $120. But that will stay the same going forward so there will not be an inflationary effect after the intial price increase.
     
  17. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    6,575
    1,189
    553
    Sep 22, 2008
    20% is enough to close a small business and yes there will be an inflationary effect. After five years that $120 item would have a greater than $20 difference when you factor in average inflation versus if it $100
     
  18. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    18,744
    2,478
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    That is largely untrue. You make a poor assumption in that calculation: that the tariff is calculated only on the initial price. Let me give you a simple example: Let's say that a product costs $100 before a 20% tariff. Then you put the tariff on and the price rises to $120 (100% passthrough as this is a simple example). Now, the next year, the price of the product increases by 3% due to higher input prices, making it $103 before the tariff. The tariff is now on that $103, not $100. So the price would have been $103 without the tariff, but is now $123.60 (as that $0.60 will pay for the additional tariff). The percentage change is the same, but the actual dollar figure increase is higher than it would have been without the tariff.
     
  19. gator_jo

    gator_jo GC Hall of Fame

    5,046
    505
    303
    Aug 9, 2024
    In any case, Trump is passing the inflationary price increase onto the American consumer ....... at the same time he is giving gave mostly rich people like himself $4.5 trillion in largely deficit-funded tax cuts.

    That guy is really looking to help the American people!

    (It's actually shocking that such flagrant and selfish disregard for Americans and their welfare isn't called out more directly.)
     
  20. DesertGator

    DesertGator VIP Member

    4,602
    2,363
    2,013
    Apr 10, 2007
    Frisco, TX
    I'm think I'm getting a little wrapped around the axle on some of the terminology here and y'all seem to have a better handle on the concept. Help me understand why this would be "inflationary"? Isn't that more a descriptive of the value of money rather than just simply the price increase/decrease in purchasing a good or service? What I'm asking here is what's the difference between a price increase from $100 to $120 of a good/service because of its value as opposed to the same increase because the fiat behind the value of money changes?
     
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2025 at 2:19 PM