Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Trump admin to destroy $500M of emergency food -enough to feed about 1.5 million children for a week

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by Shade45, Jul 15, 2025 at 9:32 PM.

  1. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    6,490
    1,183
    553
    Sep 22, 2008
    Still waiting on that link
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  2. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    8,958
    975
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
    This wasn’t out of the blue and a concern months ago. Another example of what maga thinks regarding the hungry, sick, & impoverished children.
     
    Last edited: Jul 16, 2025 at 6:58 PM
  3. AzCatFan

    AzCatFan GC Hall of Fame

    12,915
    1,233
    1,618
    Apr 9, 2007
    The original link is from the Atlantic. They are not the only news outlet reporting the same story. Here's a link from Economic Times. Rolling Stone. And Gizmodo. There's more, but that's four sources all repeating the exact same story. If the story is wrong, that's a lot of retractions each publication will have to print. And a lot of black marks on many sources.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. coleg

    coleg GC Hall of Fame

    2,540
    869
    1,928
    Sep 5, 2011
    Then use the right-center bias Economic Times :
    US to destroy 500 tons of emergency food as aid freeze stalls global relief efforts. July 15, 2025
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  5. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    24,624
    2,120
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    How about "not longer safe to consume" date? You obviously know that those terms refer to food for retail sale not donated food essential for nutrition of its intended recipients.
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  6. gator_jo

    gator_jo GC Hall of Fame

    4,964
    494
    273
    Aug 9, 2024
    Would love to see you use evidence to explain why, but we all know that's not going to happen.

    You should actually start most of your statements with "I choose to believe ..... "
     
  7. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    32,743
    2,186
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    But its an official TH approved source, that's typically the gold standard for you
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. dynogator

    dynogator GC Hall of Fame

    7,118
    408
    418
    Apr 9, 2007
    The only question I have in this case is, is it true? If it is true, and that much food was incinerated, I can't think of a context or rationalization that would excuse the waste, the inhumanity.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  9. dynogator

    dynogator GC Hall of Fame

    7,118
    408
    418
    Apr 9, 2007
    "After months of stalled approvals under the Trump administration’s foreign aid freeze, nearly 500 metric tons of high-energy biscuits purchased by the US government for humanitarian relief are now set to be incinerated".

    'The biscuits, bought during the Biden administration for $800,000, were meant to feed children in crisis zones such as Afghanistan and Pakistan. But according to multiple current and former US aid officials, the food has been sitting in a warehouse in Dubai, nearing expiration. The shipment could have fed more than 1.5 million children for a week.'

    The Economic Times
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
  10. GratefulGator

    GratefulGator GC Hall of Fame

    2,052
    647
    2,013
    Oct 15, 2016
    Boulder Colorado
    This is disgusting.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  11. g8orbill

    g8orbill Old Gator Moderator VIP Member

    131,478
    61,880
    114,663
    Apr 3, 2007
    Clermont, Fl
    liberal news sites rarely retract a wrong story unless they are being sued and are forced to do so
     
    • Funny Funny x 4
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  12. AzCatFan

    AzCatFan GC Hall of Fame

    12,915
    1,233
    1,618
    Apr 9, 2007
    The Economic Times is a right center biased outlet. And don't you think that if all these news organizations got it wrong, someone in the Trump organization would force them to print a retraction?
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  13. Shade45

    Shade45 Premium Member

    27,506
    17,423
    3,603
    Apr 3, 2007

    The food expired on July 16, 2025, the report said. It had been stored in Dubai for months as staffing and funding cuts prevented USAID, the agency that acquired it, from distributing it.

    Taxpayers will now not only absorb the $800,000 cost of the purchase, but also the $130,000 required to incinerate the food.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  14. gator_jo

    gator_jo GC Hall of Fame

    4,964
    494
    273
    Aug 9, 2024
    This is a comparison you're making of "liberal news sites", versus ...... "non-liberal" news sites?

    You got any evidence of liberal news not retracting wrong stories at a higher rate? Or are you just saying something that isn't necessarily true? What's a shorter word we could use to describe doing that?
     
  15. exiledgator

    exiledgator Gruntled

    12,423
    2,383
    3,128
    Jan 5, 2010
    Maine
    Just lock the thread then.
     
  16. antny1

    antny1 GC Hall of Fame

    5,704
    2,972
    2,698
    Dec 3, 2019
    Yosemite sam doesnt answer questions. He just tells us how things make him laugh. Literally articulates nothing of substance just drive by one liners.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  17. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    10,264
    1,422
    2,793
    Apr 8, 2007
    did it really expire then? Article mentions high energy biscuits was among the food. I have no idea what the expiration is on that since it's not something I buy but you'd be surprised if you google it.
     
  18. Shade45

    Shade45 Premium Member

    27,506
    17,423
    3,603
    Apr 3, 2007
    Yes they are expired.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  19. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,909
    1,884
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    So you as a “moderate republican” will vote for Trump over likely any Democrat. Not very moderate.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1