About the time he prosecutes the FBI imbedded with proud boys who stirred up peaceful protests into a riot.
The protests were the right to free speech and not to overthrow a government, the J6 was an insurrection because they were invading the capital in a violent way to stop the peaceful transfer of power.
So the boogymen are the following to you guys: FBI Immigrants J6 prosecutors This link has a video that proves my point: Man who helped ignite George Floyd riots identified as white supremacist: Police
And as expected. The goal posts are moved. Trump is unfit for office for what he did and claimed. That literally has nothing to do with your claim that only "Trump supporters" support riots.
I'm vurry vurry mad at that bad ole FBI for scheduling a rally riot in support of the losing presidential candidate on election certification day ..... and then forcing all the rilly rilly good people to attack the police and poo-poo on Nancy Pelosi's desk. Bad FBI!! Bad!! (Remarkable how ridiculous some stuff is that people are still repeating. Really shows who they are though. And shows what the people who agree with them are. Congrats, I guess.)
I finally see your point, and I think we actually agree. I'm going to update my statement, hopefully this pleases you; Criminals and Trump supporters support riots. (NOT only Trump supporters.) It's pretty obvious; during the BLM protests for racial justice there were violent riots after the protests. These were done by criminals, not protesters. It's safe to say that nobody supported the violence and rioting ...... except for criminals. (Certainly no Democrats supported violence and rioting.) Also; during the Trump rally over his election lies, there were also violent riots after the rally. These were done by criminals, not rally-goers. However; many Trump supporters still support those violent riots, even to the point that to this day they lie about them. (In fact, you can see the lies from Trump supporters, which support those riots, on many threads in this very forum!) Of course, not all Trump supporters support riots. But clearly some do. It can be regularly seen on this very forum. Hence, final scorecard of who supports riots; Criminals : yes Democrats : no Some Trump supporters : yes So since the only people accurately scoring affirmatively are - well, you can see, the following statement is indeed perfectly accurate; criminals and Trump supporters support riots. (I'm glad you and I can agree. I hate it when we don't.) Edit; you can see a Trump supporter trying to spread lies about Trump's certification day riot merely 4 posts before yours in Post #62!!! Lying about what happened is indeed supporting it!
You seem to be glitching. I know some maga and trump supporters fully defended the insurrection. You act as if I am denying that. I never claimed otherwise. YOU are the one making the odd claim that only one side defends such things. It's flat out goofy to claim that no democrats support violent riots. But kudos for digging deeper and deeper into that isolated trench.
You like most people don't know anything more than the false leftist version of the truth. You'll have to delve deeper to get to the truth.
Oh, my bad. Maybe you can produce some evidence of that then. Please don't glitch or, uh, ...... dig an isolated trench (??) while you produce that evidence.
If the below link is accurate, it appears that most Republicans disapproved of the forced entry into the Capital on January 6th (although most approved of Trump giving out the pardons). What's more notable to me, though, is that the percentage of Republicans which expressly approves of the mob's forced entry increased from 21 percent in 2021 to 30% at the end of 2024. Even those who disapprove have softened somewhat on how much they disapproved. I have little doubt that is, in no small part, due to the ongoing MAGA efforts to downplay the event or engage in revisionist history about it. 4 years later, Republicans' disapproval of Jan. 6 attack continues to soften — CBS News poll analysis Four years later, the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol continues to be met with disapproval from a large and bipartisan majority of Americans, although Republicans' disapproval has become more tempered, a trend that first emerged in CBS News polling just months after the attack. The percentage of Republicans who strongly disapprove of the Jan. 6 attack has dropped more than 20 points since January 2021 — from 51% then to 30% now — the lowest level since the attack, recent CBS News polling shows. Along with that softening of disapproval comes majority-Republican support for Donald Trump to pardon those who forced their way into the Capitol, something most Americans overall would oppose.
Lol. It was right here on this board. "Those arent riots! They are protests!" some even speculated if the whole thing was started by conservatives to create violence that could be blamed on the left. Again, I clearly stated that MOST on both sides condemn violence. But to deny that fringes exist on the left is just silly.
Ignorance is no excuse. Maybe its ignorance is bliss. Take your pick. There are tons of video evidence to be found. Have at it, cure your goofiness.
The event was overplayed by the liberal media which leads to downplaying by republicans. I've never approved of demonstrations period be they peaceful or violent but I have always stood behind the J6ers simply because it was a choice of stand behind the exagerating media or stand behind the protesters. There was no middle ground to be had there.
I watched live on TV and it wasn't overblown by the liberal media. Members of congress were being guarded at gunpoint and had to be evacuated. There was a not insignificant chance that members of congress could have been injured or killed if the mob made it into the chambers and they were still there. All because Trump and his supporters couldn't accept that Trump lost the election. People like yourself can keep trying to minimize it but it will forever be one of the darker days in our history, political-wise.
I think that's a false dichotomy. Those who merely went to the rally were fully within their rights to do so. There were others who forced their way inside while still others who likely got caught up in the moment and were simply following the crowd. Yet others damaged or stole property or engaged in violence to include assaulting and battering law enforcement. One may even believe that some/many charges were justified but that some individuals were either over-charged or received sentences that were disproportionate. There was a whole continuum of alleged acts and potential consequences, and I don't think our ethical or legal principles should be dependent upon how one side's media reports an event.
Bro, you're on mega super glitch. I asked for evidence supporting your statement that; -"It's flat out goofy to claim that no democrats support violent riots." .... not whatever you're glitching about. (And no, I'm not going hunting for evidence to substantiate your claim.) And of course there are fringes to both the left and right. But to try and compare that in present history, the support from both political parties for violent riots and violent rioters is equal ...... is absurd. Only the leadership of one political party created the situation for a riot by telling repeated lies, sat and approvingly watched while cops were beaten, and then applied a litmus test for party affiliation of lying about those riots. And then PARDONED 1500 violent rioters. In other words, both sides are not equal. NOT EQUAL. NOT both sides. Only one side pardons rioters and insists on lying about it.
