The only people "supporting riots" are Trump supporters, who support whatever lies and political violence their lying leader tells them to. And obviously not just about J6. Here, watch this Bill; anyone everyone who was violent during BLM protests should face full legal consequences. Now your turn on the J6 insurrection.
jo jo I have no problem with anyone who was breaking the law on January 6th being prosecuted- I sure do not remember reading you jo jo supporting going after the BLM rioters and looters or those occupying college campuses, or those who have crossed our borders illegally.
^ But voted for a guy who pardoned all those criminals. And supports furthering the lie that they didn't attack our government. LOL. And I don't recall you supporting prosecuting drunk drivers. Does that mean you support them because you didn't say anything? You surely didn't hear me support not punishing criminals, which is what we hear and see from your political hero - in the form of pardons which you didn't say anything about.
It certainly wasn't a "resurrection!" It was, however, an insurrection. From dictionary.com: "an act or instance of rising in revolt, rebellion, or resistance against civil authority or an established government." Does any of this sound familiar?
You literally contradict yourself. If the only people supporting riots are Trumpers , who would get arrested from the BLM riots?
This makes so little sense that it's hard to reply. Last time I checked though, only a certain group of people support their political leaders lies about his inciting political violence, subsequent pardon of those criminals, and his ongoing campaign to insist that everyone repeat his lies about that event. (Which we sadly see done in this very thread.) Your "both sides" support for that speaks for itself.
Lol, your grasp on reality seems lacking. But watch; I support the prosecution of anyone who commits violence being prosecuted. Now you do January 6th. Note; everyone I've seen on the "left" says the same thing. You just choose to ignore it. Repeatedly. (Then tell mistruths about J6. )
There you go, making stuff up again. You said only Trump supporters support violent protests, but then literally acknowledged violent BLM protests. That is called a contradiction. Both sides are wrong. Its ok to say that. But when you are so blinded by your allegiance to a side, you can't see that.
Please clarify. Did Jo acknowledge that HE or Democrats supported violent BLM protests as ETG1 keeps stupidly suggesting or just that BLM protests turned violent?
Jo claims that democrats did not support those protests. Obviously that is false. It was mostly democrats IN those protests and many here defended them as "protests" and not "riots". Jan 6 was a scar on our country. Everyone should be punished for what they took part in. But to act like liberal posters here were all decrying the violent protests for causes on the left is laughable. Most in both camps decried the violence in both cases. A few in both camps did not That is the truth of the matter. Jo said this: That isnt true at all. Democrats supported protests that became riots. To say otherwise is nonsense.
Get it straight, please. Jo said that Democrat politicians and votrs did not support any violent behavior. Or, quite obviously, cause it, as the leader of the Republican party did. It's pretty easy to understand. It was? Certainly you didn't poll rioters on their political beliefs, so you must have some data on this? And to again draw a distinction between the political parties, were there Democrat leaders inciting violence by telling a litany of outright lies, like the leader of the Republican Party did? And yet we had a convicted felon pardon those rioters. And to draw yet another distinction between the political parties, were there Democrat leaders who pardoned appx 1500 rioters? I didn't think so. Absurd. Both "liberal posters" and national Democrat leaders were specifically decrying any violence at the time it happened. And we still do, and we support legal consequences for violent actors. (Unlike the party that pardoned them.) Absurd. You can look on this very thread to see quite a few Trump supporters who continue to tell outright lies about the violence their leader incited. I can respect your tenacity to "both sides" this issue, but unfortunately you simply ..... have pretty much everything wrong. What a weird coincidence that only one side pardoned 1500 rioters when ..... both sides are so equal.
^^ I guess I see your point; it's not just Trump supporters who support riots, it's Donald Trump himself. In fact, he caused the riots. Has there ever been a plausible reason given for why a losing presidential candidate would hold a rally riots on election certification day, anyways? Remember when Al Gore did that? Both sides!
Insurrection and protest are both forms of resistance against authority or injustice, but they differ in their intensity and goals. Insurrection typically involves a violent uprising or rebellion against a government or ruling power, often with the aim of overthrowing the existing system. Protest, on the other hand, is a nonviolent demonstration or expression of dissent, usually aimed at raising awareness, advocating for change, or influencing policy. While insurrection can be seen as a more extreme and radical form of resistance, protest is often viewed as a more peaceful and democratic way of voicing opposition. Both insurrection and protest have played significant roles in shaping history and bringing about social and political change. Forgot my link :Insurrection vs. Protest - What's the Difference? | This vs. That
