Trump announces cease fire between Iran and Israel (to be phased in over the next 24 hours)

His daddy Bibi will violate the ceasefire and dare Trump to do something about it

 

Good luck with this.

 

You’re smarter than this. Look around the room. 108 and coop? All you need is Joe and you got the trifecta.

 

Good news if it happens.

 

Win for Iran since it doesn't look like the sites were destroyed... looks like Trump failed.

"U.S. officials say that strikes conducted on three key Iranian nuclear sites have devastated its nuclear program, but independent experts analyzing commercial satellite imagery say the nation's long-running nuclear enterprise is far from destroyed.

"At the end of the day there are some really important things that haven't been hit," says Jeffrey Lewis, a professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, who tracks Iran's nuclear facilities. "If this ends here, it's a really incomplete strike.""

Satellites show damage to Iran's nuclear program, but experts say it's not destroyed : NPR

 

He should have waited until everything was signed, sealed, and delivered. Going ahead without confirmation from either combatant is premature.

 

In 24 hours, this becomes a permanent cease fire.

Israel has notified the top 20 commanders of the IRG to flee Iran and take their families with them, or they and their families will be killed.

When this is done, it will be up to the Iranian people to decide if they want to continue under Mullah leadership or make a change as the head of the snake of oppression of the Iranian people will have been lopped off.

 

Good news and hopefully it holds. we need to work agreeable and firm terms with Israel & Iran. What about any enriched uranium they removed? they would have prepped before the bunker busters. I’m not sure how it all works but something we still need to consider.

 

Agreed!!!!!!!!!!! I pray to God this sticks.

 

Yeah, but Trump has a pension for saying things that aren't true.

 

New Trump Hotel in Tehran announced as well!

 

These people, experts in their field or not, may very well be right. But if they do not have the exact same intelligence (presumed to be facility blueprints, etc); classified capabilities of the ordnance; and strike footage showing the exact method, sequence, and timing of the impacts, then I fail to see how we should take their word against those who do have those things. In fact, the only reason one would choose to believe the expert who does not have that information over the person who does, is if one had some kind of cognitive bias that made them want to believe the strikes had been unsuccessful.

 

Take their word? Against whose word? The guy who lies about everything? The guy who said he’d give diplomacy 2 weeks then dropped bombs the next day? The guy that announced a ceasefire agreement that doesn’t exist? Talk about cognitive bais….

 

When did he say 2 weeks? He said up to 2 weeks