After reading this, I feel like I did when I had my calculus final. I’m still not sure of the goal here….nor the rules, regulations, bylaws, fine print or how this is fun. Am I the only one?
Here's another thought, since it seems that only @jeffphillips21 and I give a shit about this whole contest idea: Jeff & I each draft two teams - A,B,C,D and they come from a single pool of players. We get "action" (i.e. votes) from board members, anybody who wishes to chime in on which team they like best. If they would be so willing, we could get @rserina and @tampajack1 to rank the players w/o knowing the team compositions and then give one composite score for team dynamic once the teams are known. The player rankings + team dynamic score (I'm thinking about a simple 1-10 scale) would determine the top rosters. I would administer the draft w Jeff via PM. With the draft, there would be no such previously mentioned rules, except for position limits (2-3 G, 2-3 F, 1C, 2 bench of any position). It wouldn't be so much about winners/losers and more about discussion of the quality of the four squads.