I figured, was more just trying and failing to be funny. Don’t want to be deciding the plan of action in the moment if you can help it. This reminded of a story I heard during his first term about the Pentagon offering him several options and he chose the one they put on the table to make the others seem reasonable. Bet they’re not doing that anymore.
What would we be able to do if China starts funneling weapons for fighting vs Israel or in the streets?
I asked you to name something Joe Sobran said that was anti-semitic. You've came up with nothing so far. Try harder. Of course, anti-semitism is an all purpose smear word. If it was precisely defined it would lose it's utility, as Sobran once explained. (Like the word "racist") Buckley fired Joe Sobran for writing a column that embarrassed him, not for writing anything anti-semitic. Regarding Sobran speaking before the Institute for Historical Review: For Fear of the Jews Joe Sobran September 2003 "The news that I would be addressing the Institute of Historical Review came to some people as ... well, news. It was mentioned in the Jewish newspaper Forward and on the Zionist Wall Street Journal Online. The editors of two conservative magazines called and wrote me to express their concern that I might damage my reputation, such as it is, by speaking to “Holocaust deniers.” I’m not sure why this should matter. Even positing that I was speaking to a disreputable audience, I expect to be judged by what I say, not whom I say it to. I note that my enemies have written a great deal about me, yet they rarely quote me directly. Why not? If I am so disreputable myself, I must at least occasionally say disreputable things. Is it possible that what I say is more cogent than they like to admit? My enemies are always welcome to quote anything I say, if they dare. I would say the same things to them, and they may consider my remarks to the IHR as addressed to them too. I wasn’t just speaking to “Holocaust deniers,” but also to Holocaust believers." sobran.com/fearofjews.shtml
How is Israel launching drones from inside Iran? Did Israel have anything to do with the drone attack against bombers deep inside Russia? There has been speculation that Israel had something to do with that attack. I wouldn't know. Drones can be launched from containers mounted on trucks as we saw in Russia. Missiles can also be launched from containers. Does Israel have that technology? Don't know. Torpedos and mines are something the Nimitz has to be able to counter. As for Iranian drones, I remember reading about them getting close to the Nimitz back when Trump first took office in 2017. The Persian Gulf is a dangeróus place
A pedophile is someone who is attracted to prepubescent children.Scott Ritter is not a pedophile. You're unjustly smearing a fellow Marine
some missiles are getting through but not devastating anything. Building have been hit though. Thats happening every day. Seems like about 10% are getting through
Absolutely. Can Iran fire a Chinese nuclear missile at Israel? Of course. Can Iran forensically hide the Chinese origins of said nuclear weapon? Nope. Is there any scenario where the benefits of giving Iran nuclear weapons outweigh the risks? Also, nope.
Iran’s air defenses are not back up and running. Not sure where this idea comes from. Iran was not able to magically produce SA-23’s or SA-21’s to replace the ones they have lost in the last 9 months. So how are their air defenses back up and running.
You are really going to try this argument that got someone flayed on Twitter and publicly embarrassed? You must be desperate. Sorry, if you are attracted to underage girls and pursue them, you are a pedophile. I do not consider Ritter a Marine at this point. His actions have proved he is no linger worthy of the title. And his actions if done in uniform would have had him court martialed and dishonorable discharged, after serving his time in the brig.
This response must mean you are OK with a grown man sending naked pics to a 15 year old? Using the incel definition of pedophilia to defend him.. weird hill to die on but very telling
Actions speak louder than words. You go speak to a Holocaust Denial Society and give them aide and comfort, you are an antisemite.
Wherever one stands on this important issue, it's completely confidence-inspiring to see the decision making at work in our magnificent presidential administration. From today's NYT : There is a dispute over intelligence between Tulsi Gabbard, Mr. Trump’s director of national intelligence, who said in March that Iran was not actively building a nuclear weapon, and Mr. Trump, who retorted on Tuesday that “I don’t care what she said.” Iran, he added, was in fact close to a nuclear weapon. I'd probably have as much confidence if my English bulldog were making national security decisions.
I used the legal definition for pedophile. You and CaptUSMCNole can create your own definitions. I don't believe Scott Ritter necessarily thought he was dealing with a 15 year old girl. A person was supposed to be 18 to enter the chatroom/website. Ritter says he thought the person he was communicating with was fantasizing about being 15. I listen to Ritter because he is smart. To discount what he says, knowing he is capable of excellent analysis, would be stupid imo. It could even result in lives lost. Are you a supporter of Israel? Doesn't Israel support having men sleep with underage women? Who do you think Jeffrey Epstein worked for? Why do you think the Epstein Files are being suppressed by Pam Bondi, Dan Bongino and Kash Patel? It's because they connect the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein with Israel and the Mossad. And now a word from the Great One: It's an open secret that Epstein was connected to high ranking gov't officials in Israel. Dershowitz admitted it was Lady Rothschild herself who introduced him to Epstein."--Robert Barnes