Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Does UF Have the Best System After All?

Discussion in 'RayGator's Swamp Gas' started by doctorg8r, May 8, 2025 at 12:20 PM.

  1. danmanne65

    danmanne65 GC Hall of Fame

    4,275
    895
    268
    Jul 2, 2022
    DeLand
    Exactly this we can’t look poorly coached at all and we looked poorly coached till about game 6 last year.
     
  2. Skink

    Skink GC Hall of Fame

    I’ll take 5-1
     
  3. UF24ou14

    UF24ou14 GC Hall of Fame

    3,976
    4,548
    2,178
    Apr 19, 2009
    It was the UCF game where we finally looked interested. Don't know where it was in the schedule.
     
  4. DieAGator

    DieAGator GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 3, 2007
    All the better. Just thinking we got better as last season progressed.
     
  5. lizardbreath

    lizardbreath GC Hall of Fame

    2,687
    1,742
    2,018
    Aug 30, 2017
    Pace, FL
    I hear you on both counts. Like most, I'm nowhere near the fire BN camp, or even looking in that direction. Who would with the roster he has put together and the obvious improvements that have occurred with staffing? But he has seemingly staked out being the lead offensive force of the program as his raison d'etre - and put himself squarely on the spot by doing so with at least a portion of the fanbase. I personally believe that Billy will be less hands on, to some degree, when DJ spreads his wings against some big-time programs and starts doing insane stuff that no one can coach. If DJ is blessed with the strong OL that we hope for and he's ready to rock at a level we haven't seen yet, nobody will be talking about the need for a new OC or HC. JMHO.
    GG, BEAT EVERYBODY! :)
     
  6. 92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    15,035
    14,524
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    I seem to have missed the negativity in his post. Please point it out. Ty.
     
  7. 92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    15,035
    14,524
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    Point of order: expecting real progress and identifiable demonstrable results, isn't negativity, or hating on Billy Napier--it's actually respecting him, inspite of past results.

    Lowering expectations because he's Billy Napier, seems to me to be patently insulting.

    He's paid multi-million dollars each year; he's not a short bus special needs child--he's a well compensated professional tasked with a high pressure job.

    You measure him by his results, and you do not lower your expectations to accommodate a poor hapless muti-millionaire that you made so.