Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Pakistan India Heating Up

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by G8trGr8t, Apr 29, 2025.

  1. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    35,993
    12,638
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    been watching this for a few days. Pakistan rattling the nuclear sabre

    Pakistan claims it has ‘credible intelligence’ India will strike within 36 hours | CNN

    Tensions between India and Pakistan have escalated further after a top Pakistani official claimed early Wednesday it has “credible intelligence” that New Delhi will carry out a military action against Islamabad within the next two days.

    “Pakistan has credible intelligence that India intends carrying out military action against Pakistan in the next 24-36 hours,” Pakistan’s Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said on X. He did not elaborate on what evidence Pakistan had used to make the claim.

    Tarar’s comments come just one week after militants massacred 26 tourists in the mountainous town of Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir, a rampage that has sparked widespread outrage.


    India has accused Pakistan of being involved in the attack — a claim Islamabad denies. Pakistan has offered a neutral investigation into the incident.
     
  2. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    9,297
    1,325
    2,543
    Apr 8, 2007
    did someone get a message from Signal on this?
     
    • Funny Funny x 4
  3. slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    4,119
    873
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    There is a US centric slant to this. India is likely the China trap door. If you believe India is the mysterious country that Trump, Bessent, and Lutnik are eluding to, it’s a major step toward decoupling from China. If the US can lean in on better US investment into India as a China replacement, you have an economic pressure from the US on Pakistan and India to cool tensions. This is maybe a BRICS wedge to split up the trade block and find better one-off deals. Pakistan has a vested interest in trying to destabilize a US-India deal.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  4. slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    4,119
    873
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    Gonna side with India on this one.

    OT: When is Trump going to declassify what Pakistan and Musharraf knew about Osama Bin Ladin?
     
    • Wish I would have said that Wish I would have said that x 1
  5. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    6,586
    2,016
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/06/asia/india-pakistan-kashmir-conflict-hnk-intl

    India said early Wednesday it had launched a military operation against Pakistan, hitting “terrorist infrastructure” in both Pakistan and Pakistan administered-Kashmir, in a major escalation of tensions between the two neighbors.

    “These steps come in the wake of the barbaric Pahalgam terrorist attack in which 25 Indians and one Nepali citizen were murdered,” India’s Ministry of Defense said in a statement, referring to an attack last month tourists in India-administered Kashmir.

    “Our actions have been focused, measured and non-escalatory in nature. No Pakistani military facilities have been targeted. India has demonstrated considerable restraint in selection of targets and method of execution,” the statement added.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  6. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    35,993
    12,638
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    India fires several missiles at 'terrorist infrastructure' in Pakistan, India says

    India fired several missiles into Pakistan overnight on Tuesday, according to the Pakistani army, which said it has responded from the "air and ground."

    The attacks, labeled Operation Sindoor, targeted nine sites of "terrorist infrastructure" in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, according to the Indian Defense Ministry.

    The Pakistani army said India attacked Kotli, Muzaffaabad and Bahawalpur. Three people were killed and 12 injured, the Pakistani army said.
     
  7. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    7,770
    2,791
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    ‘Member that time people believed Trump when he said he’d never allow world powers to ever engage in War????

    And now, directly under his watch, we have potential Armageddon.

    So entertaining … like in a horror kind of way.
     
  8. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    5,822
    1,075
    553
    Sep 22, 2008
    “We had no terrorist attacks at all during my four years.”

    — Former president Donald Trump, during a Fox News town hall, Jan. 10


    “I had no wars. I’m the only president in 72 years, I didn’t have any wars.”
     
  9. orangeblue_coop

    orangeblue_coop GC Hall of Fame

    4,664
    751
    2,968
    Nov 19, 2016
    I'm not worried about an India/Pakistan conflict, Marco Rubio is in charge. And even with him having 9 jobs, he still finds time to do the most important job...rounding up students for being critical of Israel and deporting them.
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2025 at 7:49 PM
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. GratefulGator

    GratefulGator GC Hall of Fame

    1,978
    625
    2,013
    Oct 15, 2016
    Boulder Colorado
    There are only a few countries with nuclear capabilities: US, Russia, China, UK, France, India, Israel, Pakistan and N Korea.

    Pakistan got Nukes in 1998, India in 1974. Some foreign country must have helped Pakistan gain nukes so that there would be a balance of power.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  11. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    16,743
    13,413
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    Even a limited nuke exchange between them would not be a good thing. Fallout travels.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    35,993
    12,638
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    If true..not good

    Pakistani PM claims military shot down five Indian jets: Live updates

    Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has claimed that his country's military shot down five Indian fighter jets - something that Delhi has not confirmed - as a "reply from our side to them".
    Sharif said, in his TV address on Wednesday, translated by the BBC, that India had made a mistake by launching strikes on Pakistan, to which they would have to "suffer the consequences."
    "They destroyed the planes of our attackers and enemies," he added referring to Pakistan's air force shooting reportedly down the Indian planes. "This is a nation of courageous people who have high aims. They respect their country and protect their country. They will fight until the last drop of their blood.
     
  13. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    35,993
    12,638
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Pakistan authorizes military 'to avenge' India strikes

    Pakistan's National Security Council (NSC) said it had authorized the country's armed forces "to avenge" strikes by India, as powers including the U.S. and China—which borders both countries—urged the nuclear-armed neighbors to show restraint.
     
  14. citygator

    citygator GC Hall of Fame

    14,036
    2,894
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Thanks Trump! Last time these two mixed it up was in 2019 under.. yep, Trump. Weak Presidents with weak leadership lead to world squabbles.

    Much of China production has moved to India over the last few years. Whoops. More supply chain disruption. Thanks Trump!
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. NavyGator93

    NavyGator93 GC Hall of Fame

    2,061
    781
    2,663
    Dec 4, 2015
    Georgia
    I was thinking the same thing. If this happened last year, it was because we "had a weak president and no one respects us".
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Agree Agree x 2
  16. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,678
    2,244
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    If this was a case of a small country with whom we had some form of security partnership being attacked by a bigger country, then I would tend to agree, old friend. But India and Pakistan are basically peers with each other. We have a mixture of security and economic relations with both, and both countries have such relations with other great powers that we would rather they didn’t (China in the case of Pakistan, and Russia in the case of India). I’m ready to be convinced otherwise, but my initial read on this is I can’t lay the dead baby at President Trump’s doorstep for anything he did or failed to do.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  17. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,678
    2,244
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    The good news on that is, both sides are very aware of the implications of a nuclear exchange and are consequently going to proceed much more cautiously than they would have if neither side had the weapons. If this was still 1970, we might be seeing a full clash of armies by now.
     
  18. NavyGator93

    NavyGator93 GC Hall of Fame

    2,061
    781
    2,663
    Dec 4, 2015
    Georgia
    I absolutely don't feel this is trumps fault, I was just poking fun at the people who thought any military action or accident during biden's term was due to other countries not respecting our military.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  19. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    35,993
    12,638
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    How Pakistan’s military stacks up against India

    As the world’s most populous nation, India has one of the largest militaries, numbering around 1.4 million active service personnel, which include 1.2 million in the army, 60,000 in the navy and 127,000 in the air force. India also has 1.6 million-strong paramilitary forces and a reserve of 1.1 million.

    The country is a defence expenditure heavyweight. Its defence spend reached £58 billion ($77.4 billion) in 2024, the second-highest outlay in Asia after China.

    Meanwhile, Pakistan’s population is a fifth of the size and the country has been mired in an economic crisis for years.

    Last year, Pakistan’s defence budget was estimated to have been a 10th of that of its eastern neighbour.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  20. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    7,770
    2,791
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    Well that is a rational response. But our President sure quickly blamed his predecessor (both times) for anything that happened anywhere in the world, including proclaiming in no uncertain terms that no significant country would wage war on another while he was President.