That's one the fall back lines he uses when he has difficulty addressing the subject of a thread or responding to other posters directly.
Now you are back tracking and claiming "impressions" matter ... i.e., the number of times the tweet appeared on someone's feed ... instead of continuing to argue that people actually clicked through and watched the video and it's imbedded ads... big difference, there. I seriously doubt Musk is paying anyone based on impressions.
A. 14 million is nowhere near the 200 million originally claimed B. 14 million views of at least 2 seconds which includes the video auto playing when someone flows through their thread My point stands that 200 million was an outrageous claim that doesn't hold up after applying any semblance of thought.
C. you claimed you’d be shocked if it was even 2 million and it’s greater than 7 times that amount. Just admit it. People find Tucker and Trump interesting and don’t really give a shit about Biden.
"I dont need fact checking. I have a really beautiful group of super great fact checkers and let me tell you, my people are telling me, they have bigger facts than you do, ok? Not fake facts. Real big facts. I have the pillow guy and my dear friend Tucker told me that we have really really good facts, believe me. I havent seen all the facts, but thats what people are telling me. Ok? "
[ This. A million people will watch Notre Dame play Navy tomorrow. Mostly hoping to see ND get upset. Yet the narrative is always, look at how many eyeballs beloved ND gets.
Remember when people were saying that Trump was going to win the election because they saw more trunk signs in front of people's houses? Remember when they talked how Trump was going to 2in because of the boat parades? Is this sort of like that?
Lol, do you somehow actually think 200 million watched the interview? Talk about needing to come out from under a rock
Regrettably I did not make a copy or screen shot of a post you made on this forum the summer or fall of 2015 when Trump was preparing to run in the upcoming primaries, but I distinctly remember you posting you would intentionally lie if the lie furthered your cause or helped the candidate of your choice win his election. Your justification for doing so was your belief the Democrats were doing it, so your lies would counter their lies. The smell from that sort of comment can linger a long time...
I never ever, lied to you Lacuna!!!! Nor have I ever been purposefully disingenuous... and you know it!
I never claimed you personally lied to me, Rick. I think what I remember you posting back in '15 was a true statement, a declaration of a widespread "alternative facts" right wing strategy soon to become as commonplace on this forum as it is elsewhere. That's what I know and what I think.
