Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Joe’s economy still healthy: GDP expands +2.9%

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by citygator, Jan 26, 2023.

  1. exiledgator

    exiledgator Gruntled

    10,482
    1,655
    3,128
    Jan 5, 2010
    Maine
    Stimulus checks had a non-zero effect on demand, but to say people are buying cars and houses with their stimulus checks is cray.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  2. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    8,315
    1,805
    3,053
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    The GDP plummeted during the pandemic as economic output was down and demand drop sharply. The stimulus (trillion dollar dump as you called it) closed that gap but people were not making or spending what they had been. A big portion of stimulus packages were around unemployment. You get that unemployment partially replaces income, right? it doesnt go on top. The straight stimulus payments did go to everyone and were a temporary piece of the spend. Regardless, demand has now returned to a "normal" level if you straight-line GDP from where it was pre pandemic. The big difference isnt demand.. .it is supply.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    9,840
    766
    348
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    It wasn’t just the stimulus to individuals. Where do you think the Trillions poured into the economy went?
     
  4. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    9,840
    766
    348
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    And yet you still ignore the Trillions dumped into the economy, where did that go? To act is if it no effect is baffling. Like I said it wasn’t just direct payments to individuals, there was PPP, there was extended and boosted UE for long periods of time. There was rent and student loan pausing.
    I know numerous landlords who’s tenants stopped paying rent even though they didn’t lose a job, all those people had a lot more money in their pockets and most spent it.

    We didn’t suddenly have a huge number of people appear in the US to jack up demand.

    Consider the people on SS who got stimulus that increased their income and they spent it.

    Once the market bottomed in march of 2020 it went on a tear in part fueled by free and cheap money, people had a lot of returns. Much wealth was created and it was in large part due to Fed policy of easy money. The dominos got lined up and pushed over.



    For example there were large boosts in the demand of things like computers and TVs. Many of those companies saw their earnings soar only to have them fallback as the typical buying of those items surged during the pandemic. Now people have stopped buying them as they have all new models and aren’t buying at the typical clip.

    Typically when large parts of the economy is shuttered GDP should complete crash and stay down and not just for a few months. That didn’t happen because the GOV did it want it to. (not saying the were wrong) but they created this issue.
     
  5. AzCatFan

    AzCatFan GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 9, 2007
    The trillions the government pumped replaced the trillions that were lost when millions lost their jobs globally, and things stopped being produced. Not to say the stimulus had zero effect on inflation, and maybe we spent too much. But compare US inflation on an international scale, and we came in right in the middle. And many countries that had lower inflation, like China and Japan, artificially keep inflation low.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    8,315
    1,805
    3,053
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    The more trillions that left the economy in production where did that go? That’s right, nowhere and was only partially replaced by stimulus. Why can’t you get that? If there was a spike in GDP, well, then the total going into GDP would be more than going out. That didn’t happen and it is only now back up to a normal amount in dollars.

    Sure some people ended up TEMPORARILY getting more spending money ( if you weren’t negatively impacted by the pandemic) but that didn’t go into baseline money that would sustain demand for years. Nope. It was a one time distribution - or a very short time period.

    There wasn’t a sudden influx of cheap money or you’d see GDP go up above a normal upper boundary. It didn’t. Show me on any graph where you see total demand/GDP get out of whack on the upper limit. I can show you production crashes though. I have already in this thread.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    7,680
    627
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Healthcare workers and people who could work from home or didn’t lose income had “excess savings” from the pandemic, just skipping that annual vacation or not dining out put an extra $10k or $20k in people’s accounts and that phenomenon had zilch to do with stimulus. It had to do with changing lifestyles.

    Overall most of the stimulus was to replace lost income as others pointed to above, I suppose if someone had a somewhat high income but came in just under the income limit for stimulus, that’s the window where it was a legit (but only incremental) driver of inflation due to it essentially causing even more excess savings for that group, but that’s just a slice of the population right under an arbitrary cutoff. The guy that used that PPP money to buy himself a yacht? That’s called fraud. It’s definitely out there, but in the big picture I can’t see fraud being an actual driver of overall inflation.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    Jan 5, 2022
  9. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    17,728
    1,252
    1,513
    Apr 8, 2007

    Attached Files:

  10. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    9,284
    913
    1,468
    Apr 8, 2007
    Huh ... that's weird ... it doesn't look anything like what @duggers_dad posted, and has been on an uptick for the last half of the year since inflation cooled ...

    FRED must be lying ...
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2023
    • Funny Funny x 1
  11. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    9,840
    766
    348
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    Agreed.

    That’s why I’m saying to ignore those Trillions is silly.

    To be clear I’m not saying the Gov shouldn’t have done s anything but there was plenty of money spent on non essential items that supported demand and made the supply chain issues worse.

    And yes we didn’t do too bad compared to many industrialized nations, they spent like mad also.
     
  12. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    9,840
    766
    348
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    Ju
    Just curious does the sales of existing homes add to GDP or is GDP only based on production of new items?

    Just looking at GDP isn’t really fair.
    Much of the entertainment sector vanished, travel, movies, eating out etc.

    You can’t claim there wasn’t cheap money as the fed went to near zero for over a year if I’m not mistaken. That helped the price of homes through the roof(2.5% on a 30 year fixed), people putting in pools like mad and doing renovations. Every pool builder I know had contracts piling in because people could borrow super cheap.
    Labor shortages pushed the price of labor up and there was plenty of demand to keep it up.

    I know plenty of businesses in Florida that never closed and got PPP, if they used it for payroll they didn’t have to pay it back, it just ended up on their bottom line in the plus column.
     
  13. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    9,840
    766
    348
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    Many healthcare workers got huge raises and bonuses to help travel and treat covid patients. That forced hospitals everywhere to raise their wages to keep their staff.
    I’m talking tens of thousands of nurses getting paid double or more than what they make normally in addition to not taking the vacations that you speak of.

    When I’m talking stimulus I’m not just talking about the $1800 people got, I talking about all the extra money the Gov doled out to deal with the pandemic on multiple fronts.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  14. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    8,315
    1,805
    3,053
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Existing home sales do not go into GDP but all the services around the sale do, such as realtor fees.

    What you’re talking about is a dramatic preference shift that disrupted supply markets even further. That happened for sure. People stopped traveling and invested in renovating homes for instance putting pressure on supply of specific items. That wasn’t because of free money but made things more hectic cuz most industries cut back and a few ramped up but not very fast in a pandemic. Remember lumber prices?

    Prior to the pandemic, 2019, I refinanced for 2.4% mortgage. It was already cheap if you were in the market. For years. Heck I was refinancing from 2017 at 3.2%.

    Regardless we are selling a lot less of stuff for higher prices. Demand spikes from money doesn’t do that. It has you selling more for more.
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2023
  15. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    8,315
    1,805
    3,053
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    PPP was to replace lost income though right? Here was a requirement.
    5E35686A-AF2D-4C33-8733-1C16E1615C37.jpeg

    Definitely the forgiveness took the burden of sales cut backs off of owners and I’m sure there were idiots in congress that grifted off it but some enormous piece was to offset restaurants from going under due to less people eating out and stuff like that.
     
  16. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    9,840
    766
    348
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    Go back and look at the data regarding new home starts, it went nuts. Yes supply issues with lumber helped jack those prices through the roof, but record low mortgage rates helped fuel many of those sales and starts.
    Every realtor I know was selling as fast as they could, in large part because rates were low and people could pay more without affecting their monthly payment. Add to that the corporations buying up tons of properties (because the rates were ultra low) and now you have a huge demand spike.
    Fiscal stimulus lead to this. Do you really think during a pandemic with people out of work and unsure if they were going to be able to work most people would do that?

    Many builders I know passed those higher costs onto people because they knew people were going to pay the extra money.

    You may have been in a a low rate but many were not, many did cash out refis to lower their rates and took money out to remodel, and buy other stuff.

    Cheap money (although not a direct payment) fuels spending and demand.

    If people don’t have money they aren’t buying new houses, putting in pools or buying new cars.
     
  17. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    8,315
    1,805
    3,053
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Show me what you mean by nuts… new housing starts. Looks fairly linear to me until rates spiked.

    5663BDB4-D264-419F-B3BA-B9E5C93E61EE.jpeg
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. danmanne65

    danmanne65 GC Hall of Fame

    3,018
    607
    223
    Jul 2, 2022
    DeLand
    I agree with this. The republicans don’t want to spend less money they just want to excessively overspend different that the democrats.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    9,840
    766
    348
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    It went from under 1000 to over 1500 in the blink of an eye, during the midst of a pandemic. I’ll bet the bump matched the fed going to near zero on rates.
    Like it or not that’s still fiscal stimulus.
     
  20. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    9,840
    766
    348
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    I’d like them to return to the budget numbers pre pandemic across the board. Fat chance of that happening.