Why Isn't The NRA Pushing For AA Young Men To Carry?

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by 108, Jul 19, 2013.

  1. 108

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,844
    Likes Received:
    313
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,218
    legally, after the Martin case, like they did after the previous recent gun tragedies in Aurora and CT?

    I have heard nothing from the conservative talking heads promoting AA's to legally carry to prevent potential profiling that could leave them on the wrong side of a barrel

    Martin could have shot Zimmerman when he felt threatened himself, preventing his own death, and used SYG or Self Defense himself
  2. g8orbill

    g8orbill Gators VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    70,543
    Likes Received:
    4,424
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Clermont, Fl
    Ratings Received:
    +9,065
    anyone has the ability within the law to get a cwp-why the need to make it racial
  3. 108

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,844
    Likes Received:
    313
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,218
    that's not what I asked :no:
  4. WESGATORS

    WESGATORS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,370
    Likes Received:
    212
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +781
    What makes you believe Martin felt threatened?

    Why would anybody promote something exclusive for one race over another?

    Go GATORS!
    ,WESGATORS
    • Like Like x 1
  5. MichiGator2002

    MichiGator2002 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    15,790
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,853
    When has the NRA ever parsed their encouragement by race? Sure nothing would make them happier than responsible gun ownership by young black men. Or old Hispanic women. Or transsexual middle-aged East Indians.
  6. jimgata

    jimgata Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    8,484
    Likes Received:
    120
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +692
    Did the NRA actually direct any comment after any trajedy to only whites? Don't think so . If they did, show everyone when they did and what they said.
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Matthanuf06

    Matthanuf06 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    10,825
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +17
    Then Martin would have went to jail. You can't just say you were threatened. GZ watching him is not a good enough reason to hit the threatened threshold to use deadly force.

    It would be equivalent to me seeing you on the street; shooting you, and saying I felt threatened bc you were looking at me.

    But sure I'm for all people carrying legally.
    • Like Like x 1
  8. cjgator76

    cjgator76 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    17,215
    Likes Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +409
    Does the NRA typically have different messages for different ethnic groups? If not, why would it start now?
  9. KelticGator

    KelticGator Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    3,085
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +107
    Wouldn't the NRA then have to propose that "minors" be allowed to carry firearms since Trayvon was not yet 18?

    That's a MAJOR leap. Kids with guns . . . yeah, good idea. :rolleyes:
  10. baygator1

    baygator1 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,971
    Likes Received:
    1,432
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +1,667
    Epic fail of a post, intentionally ignorant, factually incorrect and plainly divisive on its face.
    • Like Like x 3
  11. ga8orman1

    ga8orman1 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    543
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings Received:
    +35
    Exactly! What a stupid premise for a thread.
  12. reformedgator

    reformedgator Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    1,835
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +191
    I think we would be surprised how many actually have them illegally.
  13. orangeblueorangeblue

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    Another Where's the outrage??! post.
  14. orangeblueorangeblue

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    Some surprised by how many.

    Others surprised by how few.

    Depends which way your bias swings, I suppose.
  15. wgbgator

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    22,902
    Likes Received:
    388
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,584
    It is that, but I've often believed that gun control is an easier sell when people deemed to be "dangerous" or "undesirable" are arming themselves. This was true in the 60s and 70s when crime was high and black radicals were arming themselves and guys like Ronald Reagan (as CA gov) were passing gun control legislation. The NRA however, has been pretty consistently in favor of arming nearly anyone, even radicals of various stripes.
  16. cjgator76

    cjgator76 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    17,215
    Likes Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +409
    Not sure about this instance, but generally those are characteristics of a talking point taken from a livid lefty website.
  17. kygator

    kygator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2,811
    Likes Received:
    85
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +219
    I don't think it was intentionally ignorant. I'm sure he meant it to be brilliant.
  18. 108

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,844
    Likes Received:
    313
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,218
    i said "young men" with implies over 18

    but to the heart of my question, why hasn't the NRA historically had any massive urban outreach program, no overt efforts to make the culture of its organization more palatable to a black, latino, urban population, where self-protection is much more of a necessity?

    I don’t see how the promotion of responsible gun ownership is not in the perceived best self-interest of more black Americans. I don’t see how actively encouraging and mobilizing more urban black members is not in the perceived best interest of the NRA and other gun-rights organizations.

    seems odd from a business perspective to not include outreach to the very people who need protection the most. What am I missing?
  19. g8orbill

    g8orbill Gators VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    70,543
    Likes Received:
    4,424
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Clermont, Fl
    Ratings Received:
    +9,065
  20. MichiGator2002

    MichiGator2002 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    15,790
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,853

Share This Page