Were Human's Designed To Eat Meat?

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by 108, Dec 30, 2013.

  1. 108
    Offline

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    18,022
    Likes Received:
    371
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,406
    Clearly we can handle meat, but are we biologically intended to?

    Discuss


    [​IMG]
  2. mocgator
    Offline

    mocgator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,449
    Likes Received:
    309
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The ATL
    Ratings Received:
    +645
    Animals have two functions....

    taste good and fit well....
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  3. channingcrowderhungry
    Offline

    channingcrowderhungry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,966
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Ratings Received:
    +858
    It's tough to say whether we were or weren't but I don't think the chart makes any difference. Since humans use tools to hunt and generally cook meat and use tools to eat meat, looking at our lack of claws and dull teeth and things of that nature really mean nothing. We would have evolved past the point of most things on the chart years ago.

    If I were to guess, humans were intended to eat 85-90% herbivore diet. But that's a guess based on historical evidence, hunting and gathering, etc.
  4. fastsix
    Offline

    fastsix Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    6,502
    Likes Received:
    247
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Seattle
    Ratings Received:
    +1,106
    Clearly we can handle sitting in front of a computer all day, but are we biologically intended to?

    As long as steak, lobster, ribs, and fried chicken continue to taste good, and don't kill me (quickly at least), I'll continue to eat them. Our bodies might not be designed for it, but our brains sure were.
    • Like Like x 1
  5. CHFG8R
    Offline

    CHFG8R Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    6,791
    Likes Received:
    321
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    St. Augustine, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,390
    Exactly. Also, even if we did originally (at some point in our evolution) eat only foraged plants, it is clearly our taste for meat (and the tools, communication, etc. needed to acquire it) that made us unique among species on this planet. We are also pretty sure that this preceded agricultural cultivation.
  6. dangolegators
    Offline

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,456
    Likes Received:
    92
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +683
    Seems pretty clear to me that we were designed to be omnivores.
    • Like Like x 1
    • Useful Useful x 1
  7. Dreamliner
    Offline

    Dreamliner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    64,210
    Likes Received:
    250
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +1,123
    My surmise is that our canine teeth were designed to shred okra.
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. gatorev12
    Offline

    gatorev12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Messages:
    11,700
    Likes Received:
    289
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,544
    Most mammals are omnivores at that, so it's hardly like this should be strange.

    Even apex predators like bears and wolves eat plants (and survive on them indefinitely) if they need to...so not exactly sure what that list proves?
  9. channingcrowderhungry
    Offline

    channingcrowderhungry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,966
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Ratings Received:
    +858
    Chimps are omnivores, which seems like a good glimpse at our past diet. They are very plant heavy though.
  10. asuragator
    Offline

    asuragator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2009
    Messages:
    20,531
    Likes Received:
    4,090
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +6,082
    Designed or not, I really enjoy a well made steak and will not give up bacon.
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. oragator1
    Offline

    oragator1 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    12,776
    Likes Received:
    442
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,677
    The single biggest advancement humans made was fire.
    The amount of chewing needed for Raw meat is exponentially more than cooked meat - once there was fire our jaws shrank because they could, which allowed our brains to get bigger and mankind took off. Also affected the need for certain teeth, and as mentioned we were hunters so claws weren't needed.
    My understanding was that we were mainly herbivores with some shrimp and other small meats thrown in, which is why our bodies do so well with omega 3s from fish. Over time with hunting and other advancements we expanded our diet, but not out of the realm of what were were always capable of.
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  12. HallGator
    Offline

    HallGator Administrator VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    43,642
    Likes Received:
    948
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Outer Limits
    Ratings Received:
    +3,730
    What about eating.....................well never mind.
    • Funny Funny x 1
  13. fastsix
    Offline

    fastsix Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    6,502
    Likes Received:
    247
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Seattle
    Ratings Received:
    +1,106
    Sashimi?

    Sure it's raw, but it's fish and it's sliced very thin.
    • Like Like x 2
  14. asuragator
    Offline

    asuragator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2009
    Messages:
    20,531
    Likes Received:
    4,090
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +6,082
    I'm pretty sure humans were meant to eat thinly sliced poisonous puffer fish rather than in big chunks :D
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2013
  15. tim85
    Offline

    tim85 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    4,155
    Likes Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Jacksonville, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,153
    So our brains grew bigger simply because there was now space for it to grow bigger? Does this work for other animals as well who have more than enough space for more brain but yet still have small brains?
    • Like Like x 1
  16. tegator80
    Offline

    tegator80 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    5,693
    Likes Received:
    1,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Richmond, VA
    Ratings Received:
    +2,400
    Overall, humans are pathetic excuses for an animal. I am going with the above theory that we got off the general animal train when our brains grew so that we didn't play by the same rules. So what we see is the last remnants of an ancestor that doesn't pertain to what we finally evolved into. And if someone said we are vegetarians by nature I couldn't care less.

    As an aside, when you see the reality shows and they have to forage for food, there is a remarkable difference between when they are not eating meat and when meat is suddenly put in their diets. The fat, protein and nutrients are just too concentrated of a food source to be made up easily in plant material.
  17. oragator1
    Offline

    oragator1 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    12,776
    Likes Received:
    442
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,677
    Interesting question. I looked it up just now, seems as if the theory has been refined a bit since I heard it a number of years ago, it's more about the newfound calories we could comsume going to brain growth than increased cranial capacity. But this article also addresses the question of primates.

    http://scitechdaily.com/cooking-fueled-the-growth-of-the-human-brain/


    question
  18. tim85
    Offline

    tim85 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    4,155
    Likes Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Jacksonville, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,153
    Interesting to me just how often these theories change and are "refined." However, it's hard to call it a refinement when the change is completely different than what was stated before.

    So if other animals had only learned to cook their meals like those neanderthals, they may have been able to increase their brain sizes. Do theories like these go hand in hand with most modern evolutionary theories, or are they separate?
  19. RealGatorFan
    Offline

    RealGatorFan Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    13,615
    Likes Received:
    175
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +802
    We were designed to adapt to whatever conditions are presented us. We might not like it but we could subsist on roots if we had no other choice.
  20. oragator1
    Offline

    oragator1 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    12,776
    Likes Received:
    442
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,677
    Don't know if what I heard years ago was peer reviewed (it was some science channel show so may have just been some scientist's idea)but this last one was published. Either way fire was the catalyst for the development of brain growth, which was the important point. Wasn't trying to stoke a larger evolution vs religion debate, those go nowhere here and not something I want to participate in.

Share This Page