Has anyone noticed the irony here on this thread? A year ago at this time a lot of posters (including me) were not happy with the security arrangements in Benghazi. Nor were we happy with the lack of military response to rescue or at the least make the terrorist pay for their dirty deed. At that time Rowe and a host of others offered up one lame excuse after another about security and intelligence lapses in Benghazi. They also told us that we are quibbling about a handful of dead Americans when we lost far more Americans in Iraq. Fast forward a year later. We now have Rowe wanting military action when we still do not have all of the facts (at the best circumstantial). One more twist to the irony. There were about 1,400 deaths linked ot the gas attack. Rowe wants to go to war over 1,400 dead whe on the other hand over 100K have already been killed in this Syrian civil war. I guess we should of gone to war over the genocide acts in Africa and other places that we stayed clear of.