Trump's favorite dictator Rodrigo Duterte orders his soldiers to shoot women in the vagina

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by orangeblue_coop, Feb 13, 2018.

  1. orangeblue_coop
    Online

    orangeblue_coop GC Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2016
    Messages:
    998
    Likes Received:
    154
    Trophy Points:
    238
    Ratings Received:
    +2,020
    Rodrigo Duterte last week directed his soldiers to specifically target women rebel fighters by shooting them in the vagina, according to local reports.

    Addressing a group of former communist rebels, the Philippines president said his armed forces should not kill female rebels but shoot them in their genitals because without them they are useless.

    “Tell the soldiers. There’s a new order coming from the mayor. We won’t kill you. We will just shoot your vagina,” Duterte reportedly said. “If there is no vagina, it would be useless."

    An official government translation of the speech, given on Feb. 7, replaced the word vagina with a dash. The transcript says the audience laughed in response.

    https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/8xdqex/duterte-orders-soldiers-to-shoot-women-in-the-vagina


    This is the same swell guy who Trump has bragged about having a "great relationship" with.
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 2
  2. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    58,657
    Likes Received:
    8,351
    Trophy Points:
    2,318
    Ratings Received:
    +34,571
    Lol... Trump's fault? Unfreaking real, man.

    You know, the voters know what BS is...
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
  3. GatorFanCF
    Offline

    GatorFanCF Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,618
    Likes Received:
    364
    Trophy Points:
    273
    Ratings Received:
    +5,374
    Ah, another thread about something Trump tweeted, said, thought about, almost did, etc. If he really was so horrible the Left would not have to reach so far, so often. Keep it up.
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. GatorRade
    Offline

    GatorRade Rad Scientist Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    7,582
    Likes Received:
    764
    Trophy Points:
    518
    Ratings Received:
    +10,102
    Agree that this doesn’t really involve Trump. (Though he probably shouldn’t have made positive comments on him)

    However, it does give you an idea about what it was like coming to these boards to continually see threads about Saul Alinsky, Obama’s half brother, or some pastor that Obama once asked for directions.
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  5. PITBOSS
    Offline

    PITBOSS GC Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2007
    Messages:
    4,389
    Likes Received:
    56
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Ratings Received:
    +839
    Yes trump does publicly support despots. Which only helps them.

    GOod post, the potus should receive feedback on who they support.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. gatornana
    Offline

    gatornana Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    46,447
    Likes Received:
    1,050
    Trophy Points:
    1,553
    Ratings Received:
    +8,338

    Since the US is considered a world leader, Trump's condoning Duterte's policies does erode human rights in countries run by dictators and despots.
    • Agree Agree x 4
  7. fastsix
    Offline

    fastsix Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    10,037
    Likes Received:
    815
    Trophy Points:
    643
    Location:
    Seattle
    Ratings Received:
    +12,734
    If you shot someone in the lower abdomen (which is about as close you're realistically going to get to being able to shoot a woman in the vagina) with a battle rifle, I'm pretty sure losing the ability to have sex is going to be pretty far down the list of her immediate concerns. He's essentially making jokes about killing women. This guy is a scumbag.
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  8. gator7_5
    Offline

    gator7_5 GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    12,209
    Likes Received:
    218
    Trophy Points:
    518
    Ratings Received:
    +3,946
    People who post stuff like this should think back and remember how lame they thought the posters were who posted the same stuff about Obama and the Muslim brotherhood and Farrakhan.
    • Winner Winner x 2
  9. madgator
    Offline

    madgator GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 28, 2007
    Messages:
    10,912
    Likes Received:
    603
    Trophy Points:
    598
    Location:
    South Florida
    Ratings Received:
    +6,704

    Was it Obama that normalized relations with Cuba? And correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't Cuba #1 on the UN's human rights violation list?

    How exactly does that factor into your point?
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    58,657
    Likes Received:
    8,351
    Trophy Points:
    2,318
    Ratings Received:
    +34,571
    And what do you think about Cuba and Venezuela... does 'time' heal all those murders and atrocities for you?
  11. gatornana
    Offline

    gatornana Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    46,447
    Likes Received:
    1,050
    Trophy Points:
    1,553
    Ratings Received:
    +8,338
    It's a trend in Trump's and Tillerson's foreign policy......they both stated early on human rights would not be a part of their conversation with world leaders. As a world leader, the US is essentially giving a pass to dictators in countries that kill their own people and dismantle their democracies.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ghts-around-the-world/?utm_term=.6d0b8330c9ea
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  12. dynogator
    Offline

    dynogator GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    6,105
    Likes Received:
    227
    Trophy Points:
    273
    Ratings Received:
    +3,627
    Grab them by the p sounds positively benign compared with Trump's good friend's suggestion.
    • Like Like x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  13. DaveFla
    Offline

    DaveFla GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    16,796
    Likes Received:
    199
    Trophy Points:
    843
    Ratings Received:
    +6,050
    So, now he’s one of Trump’s “good friends”?

    Wow... just wow...
  14. orangeblue_coop
    Online

    orangeblue_coop GC Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2016
    Messages:
    998
    Likes Received:
    154
    Trophy Points:
    238
    Ratings Received:
    +2,020
    Well this sick, demented dictator did sing Trump a love song during dinner. So they might be more than just "good friends."
  15. dynogator
    Offline

    dynogator GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    6,105
    Likes Received:
    227
    Trophy Points:
    273
    Ratings Received:
    +3,627
    Trump said they had "a great relationship," and invited him to visit the White House. I mean, Trump doesn't really seem to "do," friendship, but he sure seemed impressed by the horrible Filipino dictator, heaping him with praise and approval. Almost like Trump was looking in a mirror.
  16. dangolegators
    Offline

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,149
    Likes Received:
    173
    Trophy Points:
    598
    Ratings Received:
    +5,608
    Looked but I couldn't find a UN human rights violation list. Could you link it, please.
  17. madgator
    Offline

    madgator GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 28, 2007
    Messages:
    10,912
    Likes Received:
    603
    Trophy Points:
    598
    Location:
    South Florida
    Ratings Received:
    +6,704
    That's an interesting answer that had nothing to do with the question. But I'll interpret.

    So you're saying that it's an extension of Obama's foreign policy considering their normalization of Cuba and recognition of the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.....which of course helped fund ISIS

    Meaning that the Obama administration didn't factor human rights in their policy decision making and gave a pass to dictators and terrorist organizations that kill not only their people but every one else and have zero interest in any form of democracy

    and yet, you expressed zero outrage or even slight criticism about anything Obama did
    • Winner Winner x 2
  18. lacuna
    Offline

    lacuna The Conscience of Too Hot VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    60,905
    Likes Received:
    2,322
    Trophy Points:
    1,603
    Location:
    Gainesville
    Ratings Received:
    +6,076
    Posts 17 and 18 - Double penetration to assure your point was made? :rolleyes:
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. gatornana
    Offline

    gatornana Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    46,447
    Likes Received:
    1,050
    Trophy Points:
    1,553
    Ratings Received:
    +8,338
    I don't recall Obama dropping human rights as a part of our foreign policy. The article I posted earlier did note that presidents do contradict themselves in foreign affairs which is what you're referring to here. There's a significant shift here with Trump and Tillerson dropping human rights from foreign policy.....it'll have far reaching consequences.
    • Funny Funny x 1
  20. steveGator52
    Offline

    steveGator52 GC Legend

    Joined:
    May 3, 2016
    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    DC Metro area
    Ratings Received:
    +247
    What part of the phrase “women rebel fighters” don’t you understand? It’s not like he is advocating his troops run around shooting women in the genitals for the heck of it. The term “fighter” means an enemy combatant. A woman can kill you just as easily as a man can.

    The above aside, Duterte is obviously a male chauvinist. His view of women is that they are good for procreation and if they can’t procreate, then they are useless. Anyway, I thought you were for equal treatment for women in wartime conditions. When a woman starts attacking/shooting soldiers, why should she be treated any different than a man? Of course this would more likely than not violate the Geneva Convention, but I am not sure non-uniformed combatants would have the same protection unless they are taken prisoner.

Share This Page