Trademark board rules against Redskins name

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by dadx4, Jun 18, 2014.

  1. dadx4
    Offline

    dadx4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    30,161
    Likes Received:
    707
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Gainesville, Fl
    Ratings Received:
    +2,073
  2. ThePlayer
    Offline

    ThePlayer VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    28,365
    Likes Received:
    522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,411
    A sad day for 'Skins fans and non-fans alike.

    We are becoming sooo politically obtuse as a society that we are now eating our own.
    • Agree Agree x 5
  3. dadx4
    Offline

    dadx4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    30,161
    Likes Received:
    707
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Gainesville, Fl
    Ratings Received:
    +2,073
    Amazing isn't it. They could change the emblem from an Indian to a "red skin" potato to really piss off the PC psychos.
    • Funny Funny x 2
  4. MichiGator2002
    Online

    MichiGator2002 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    16,945
    Likes Received:
    826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +3,665
    So, after having failed to come to grips with the fact that Daniel Snyder isn't actually a subject of Harry Reid or Barack Obama personally, the thuggish bully mindset of an authoritarian leftist naturally shifts to wanton abuse of government power --

    http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2014/06/18/trademark-board-rules-against-washington-redskins-name/

    Article includes this quote of the loathesome Reid -- "Daniel Snyder may be the last person in the world to realize this, but it's just a matter of time until he is forced to do the right thing and change the name."

    When will Reid, or Obama, or statists in general be forced to the right thing and mind their own freaking business?
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. dangolegators
    Online

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,833
    Likes Received:
    127
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +859
    What it this country coming to when we can't have racist nicknames for our sports teams?
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. Gatorpika
    Offline

    Gatorpika VIP Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    4,014
    Likes Received:
    322
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +959
    You guys don't realize what a great thing this is. Eventually they will revoke FSU's trademark as well. We can print tshirts trolling them and sell them on the internet without getting sued. Eventually they will get fed up and have to change their name. Since gators and hurricanes are already locked up, they are left with oranges and drunk tourists!
    • Funny Funny x 2
  7. WESGATORS
    Offline

    WESGATORS Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,561
    Likes Received:
    306
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,099
    This has been tried before and it has failed. From the article Michi posted:

    Go GATORS!
    ,WESGATORS
  8. g8trjax
    Offline

    g8trjax Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2007
    Messages:
    3,172
    Likes Received:
    85
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +410
    Very bad precedent. Not surprised though.
  9. nolagator
    Offline

    nolagator Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2014
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    63
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings Received:
    +400
    I would change it to Warriors but this is pure buffalo dung. Redskins can be very much considered derogatory however, how is this a US Government issue?

    This is for the NFL to handle. What the "Fighting Irish" is not derogatory? Or the Celtics? And what about the NJ Devils? As a Christian can I demand this to be changed?

    I am a Southern Boy BUT I don't fly the Stars and Bars because I am not into offending people. That said, its not the Government's to say that I can't.
  10. dangolegators
    Online

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,833
    Likes Received:
    127
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +859
    Sure. You can demand any changes you want. But it is funny that you bring up Christians in this thread, as Christians are the most PC-requiring group of all. You can't even say 'happy holidays' without many of them going nuts.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. GatorBen
    Offline

    GatorBen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    7,187
    Likes Received:
    625
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,470
    Technically the US government isn't telling them that they can't. It's just telling them that they aren't entitled to registered trademark protection (basically the right to exclusive use of the marks in commerce) because 15 USC s. 1052(a) says that a mark may be refused registration if it "Consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute[.]"
    • Informative Informative x 2
  12. dangolegators
    Online

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,833
    Likes Received:
    127
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +859
    Well, sounds like they nailed it on this one then.
  13. wgbgator
    Offline

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,880
    Likes Received:
    492
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +2,178
    They can keep the name, they'll just lose some revenue if they do. We'll see what wins out: the principle of being able to have a racist team name or greed. I'm going with greed.
  14. MichiGator2002
    Online

    MichiGator2002 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    16,945
    Likes Received:
    826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +3,665
    Anybody here ever vote for anybody at the US Patent Office? Just want to double check. To whom are these people accountable for their radical and spurious interpretations of their authority?
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. gatorman_07732
    Offline

    gatorman_07732 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    32,588
    Likes Received:
    2,508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    The Irish Riviera
    Ratings Received:
    +5,218
    Cowboy-Redskin games will never be the same
  16. Gatorpika
    Offline

    Gatorpika VIP Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    4,014
    Likes Received:
    322
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +959
    The executive branch, who are most likely the ones behind these radical and spurious interpretations of their authority. It smells political, especially since this has gone to court before with very similar facts.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. wgbgator
    Offline

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,880
    Likes Received:
    492
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +2,178
    So basically, critics are like: "Stop your PC government meddling by continuing to enforce government protections!"
    • Funny Funny x 1
  18. g8tr80
    Offline

    g8tr80 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    7,607
    Likes Received:
    202
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +1,125
    Well that's one way of looking at it.
  19. tilly
    Offline

    tilly Superhero Moderator VIP Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    22,178
    Likes Received:
    1,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wilmington, NC via FLA
    Ratings Received:
    +6,319
    Its the removal of religious phrases during the holidays that is politically correct, not the other way around!
    No one is demanding an end to the term "Happy Holidays." But many demand any image/word of religion be removed.

    Are you even being serious here?
    • Winner Winner x 2
  20. wgbgator
    Offline

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,880
    Likes Received:
    492
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +2,178
    This case has been in court for like 8 years now right? So, it was Bush behind this?

Share This Page