Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by HallGator, Aug 11, 2013.
All that extra CO2 might come in handy for the impending Maunder Minimum redux.
Please tell me you never fell for the scheme and bought a carbon credit?
Naww I am not a fan of cap and trade.
It is possible to think man is contributing to warming without wanting to go overboard on the solutions.
Good to hear...
I just don't believe mankind can change the climate without bankrupting nations in the process.
as I understand it this is another type of scrubbing system that will be profitable if it is determined that CO2 must be reduced. is that correct?.
We already have :laugh:
Short on details. Would be curious to see how this actually works and what it actually removes.
Yep and the greenies will find something to have Hussein block this technology.
This is being touted as green technology so why would they do that?
This is a non-starter. The GW crowd has spent too much time and money building up this bogey man to let something like this spoil their plans.
Just like Jesse and Al never want race relations improved.
Your hate for these people is strong, and therefore your view of them is not necessarily accurate. Maybe you should ask a climate scientist personally. I think you'd be surprised by his/her answer.
Good info on HNG:
If you means liberals, then yes. The only thing I have against these scientists is their lack of principles or maybe their fear of being truthful.
Well, I think you might be running into a epistemic conundrum here. In order to know that scientists lack principles or aren't truthful, you'd have to presuppose a different conclusion and believe that your method for deriving this conclusion is easily identified as superior to that used by climate scientists. Then I wonder, if your scientific method is so good, why aren't the climate scientists using it? To which I assume you'd reply, because they lack principles. And how do we know that? Because they don't agree with your conclusion.
So in other words, you know that you are right because climatologists are liars, and you know that they are liars because you are right.
But, not in Obama's world of nanny-state control, and our enslavement to the government.
The vice versa has been happening for the last 16 years or so.This in spite of increasing CO2 concentrations.